you know, a parent who continues to love a defiant child means that the parent is absolutely weak , you can’t apply this to God. when she brings up parent loving his child, it makes no sense when applied to God. is God weak and blind in love?
Nice use of the Slippery Slope fallacy. Same sex marriage has existed for some time in some countries, without any of the oft-used arguments about polygamy, incest etc coming true.
It’s most definitely a fallacy. You’re equating the idea of same-sex relationships with polygamy and incest, are you not? The assumption that one will automatically lead to the other?
You simply repeated the fallacy last time out. You know full well what the hashtag on the Foreign Office tweet relates to, yet chose to be disingenuous. You knew full well what I meant by consenting adults too. The moment you try to equate same-sex marriage with incest, you are indulging in the Slippery Slope fallacy.
lol you have zero understanding of fallacies. By your evil logic (two adults consenting) brothers and sisters can marry validly. You have lost the argument dude.
The only way in which I lose is when you make the wilful distortion of same-sex relationships to somehow = other forms of relationship. It is not possible to do this out of ignorance so it is deliberately dishonest. The very basis of the fallacy.
Uh huh. Let’s recap. You know what the implication of the Foreign Office tweet was. You chose to make it about something else. Care to explain how that is in good faith?
To quote from the Qur’an on honesty: Lying is wrong, except in three things: the lie of a man to his wife to make her content with him; a lie in war, for war is deception; or a lie to settle trouble between people” (Ahmad, 6.459. H).
“ame sex marriage has existed for some time in some countries, without any of the oft-used arguments about polygamy, incest etc coming true”
In the ancient royal Egyptian families, they used to marry sibling with each other for the royal blood remains pure!
I believe it’s permitted in Zoroastrianism as well.
Give up the obfuscation. It’s no slippery slope fallacy when your principle (nothing wrong if it’s two consenting adults) applies to the example that was provided.
Of course it’s a fallacy, and one that Paul then expands to appeal to mockery with the Vader remarks, and then expands to involve a comparison between same-sex relationships and beastiality. That’s the very essence of the fallacy right there.
For once I agree with Paul. Allowing this kicks open the door for those perverts who want to have sex with girls as young as nine. What’s next – marrying your own niece who also happens to be your stepson’s wife?
Blogging Theology 
LikeLiked by 2 people
you know, a parent who continues to love a defiant child means that the parent is absolutely weak , you can’t apply this to God. when she brings up parent loving his child, it makes no sense when applied to God. is God weak and blind in love?
LikeLiked by 2 people
she asks “what did Allah do for you?”
He did something greater than a violent and bloody ritual, He said He allows us to talk to Him .
Allah gives Himself to talk to, on the other hand your god talks to you through a bloody ritual.
Allah didn’t tell human that He is “born in sin”
“dirty”
“trash”
“defective”
LikeLiked by 1 person
Nothing wrong with two consenting adults being in a relationship.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Could they be sibling?
LikeLiked by 2 people
Obviously not the implication of the Foreign Office tweet, or my comment.
LikeLike
thats right. Mothers should be able to marry their daughters. Fathers their sons. Two sisters each other. And so on..
LikeLiked by 2 people
Nice use of the Slippery Slope fallacy. Same sex marriage has existed for some time in some countries, without any of the oft-used arguments about polygamy, incest etc coming true.
LikeLike
its not a fallacy. Its an application of your bankrupt premise to the various logical possibilities.
People are now campaigning to legalise man boy relationships using your logic. So you are dead wrong.
LikeLiked by 2 people
It’s most definitely a fallacy. You’re equating the idea of same-sex relationships with polygamy and incest, are you not? The assumption that one will automatically lead to the other?
LikeLike
it is most definitely not a fallacy. You are running away from the consequences of your own immoral position. Man up.
LikeLiked by 3 people
You simply repeated the fallacy last time out. You know full well what the hashtag on the Foreign Office tweet relates to, yet chose to be disingenuous. You knew full well what I meant by consenting adults too. The moment you try to equate same-sex marriage with incest, you are indulging in the Slippery Slope fallacy.
LikeLike
lol you have zero understanding of fallacies. By your evil logic (two adults consenting) brothers and sisters can marry validly. You have lost the argument dude.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The only way in which I lose is when you make the wilful distortion of same-sex relationships to somehow = other forms of relationship. It is not possible to do this out of ignorance so it is deliberately dishonest. The very basis of the fallacy.
LikeLike
boring. You lost the debate. Move on..
LikeLiked by 2 people
Uh huh. Let’s recap. You know what the implication of the Foreign Office tweet was. You chose to make it about something else. Care to explain how that is in good faith?
To quote from the Qur’an on honesty: Lying is wrong, except in three things: the lie of a man to his wife to make her content with him; a lie in war, for war is deception; or a lie to settle trouble between people” (Ahmad, 6.459. H).
LikeLike
You prove the truth of the saying: ‘even the devil can quote Scripture’.
LikeLike
Resorting to insults to defend dishonesty is not a defence of your equation of same-sex relationships with the likes of incest and polygamy.
LikeLike
Dude you have been EXPOSED. Have the decency to quietly slink off.
LikeLike
“ame sex marriage has existed for some time in some countries, without any of the oft-used arguments about polygamy, incest etc coming true”
In the ancient royal Egyptian families, they used to marry sibling with each other for the royal blood remains pure!
I believe it’s permitted in Zoroastrianism as well.
LikeLiked by 1 person
yes brother/sister marriage is permitted. Darth Vader must approve this practice. It meets his requirements perfectly.
LikeLike
What does that have to do with the here and now?
LikeLike
everything. Your views lead to hell.
LikeLike
Uh huh. Meanwhile, let’s suggest exclusionary policies against same-sex couples because your personal faith should override their rights.
LikeLike
i love my dog, Darth Vader says i can marry it.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I wonder if you would be willing to defend your use of the Slippery Slope fallacy in a proper debate?
LikeLike
” But they love each other” !
How cruel you are!
LikeLiked by 2 people
I love my dog. My dog loves me. We should get married!
LikeLiked by 2 people
If you’re both adults, why not?
LikeLiked by 3 people
Darth Vader is from the dark side. He encourages any perversion and unnatural acts.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Give up the obfuscation. It’s no slippery slope fallacy when your principle (nothing wrong if it’s two consenting adults) applies to the example that was provided.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Of course it’s a fallacy, and one that Paul then expands to appeal to mockery with the Vader remarks, and then expands to involve a comparison between same-sex relationships and beastiality. That’s the very essence of the fallacy right there.
LikeLike
Lol
LikeLiked by 1 person
Glad you agree.
LikeLiked by 1 person
For once I agree with Paul. Allowing this kicks open the door for those perverts who want to have sex with girls as young as nine. What’s next – marrying your own niece who also happens to be your stepson’s wife?
LikeLike
Then you’re as guilty of equating homosexuality with other, obviously very different and non-consenual acts as anyone else who employs that fallacy.
LikeLike
Darth Vader still on a rant I see
LikeLike
Vader opposed freedom. Guess who’s therefore closer to his ideals?
LikeLike
You embody his ideals.
LikeLike
LOL. You’re funny. Got anything substantial to say?
LikeLike
Already said it.
LikeLike
Must have missed it beneath your address hominems, appeal to mockery and slippery slope fallacies.
LikeLike
Darth Vader you really need to get a life.
LikeLike
actually darth I expected from you comment like “I want to marry my Hoover”
LikeLiked by 2 people
> Of course it’s a fallacy
Can you explain this bit?
LikeLiked by 1 person