Muslims are familiar with the tittle “son of Mary” for Jesus but it’s interesting to note that Jesus was being called the “son of Mary” by his contemporaries in a strand of tradition before the earliest canonical gospel was written. This title may have died out because people like the author of Matthew considered it to be offensive and changed that stream of tradition.
Categories: Biblical scholarship, Islam
More nonsense from Yahya.
The contemporaneous use of “son of mary” was not used as a title. It was simply a descriptive term used by local peers.
The use of the title “son of mary” is non existent amongst protestants. The reformation relegated the prominence of Mary The fact muslims use it is an indication Muhummad came into contact with pre-reformation eastern orthodox christians.
LikeLike
The fact that Mark uses the epithet “Son of Mary” is very interesting, and as Yahya points out, it helps to confirm that this “descriptive term” or title was being used by contemporaries before the earliest canonical Gospel.
Regardless of what the Protestant Reformation decided (many years after later), the fact that an earlier tradition describes Jesus this way validates the Qur’anic usage of “Isa Ibnu Maryam” and corroborates that the earliest known proper title for Jesus is the “Son of Mary.” This information vindicates the Qur’an in relation to this point.
I am not sure why Christians would have a problem with such a title. Far from being an insult, the title “Son of Mary” is an honorable name which emphasizes the miraculous nature of the virgin birth. Seems like there would be no argument here.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Wht does your response have to do with the above achill?
LikeLike
Jesus, the son of Mary the word of truth
“ That is Jesus, the son of Mary the word of truth about which they are in dispute. it does not befit the majesty of God that He should beget a son. Glory be to Him! He is far above that: when He decrees something, He says only, Be! and it is ”
( Mary 19:34-35 )
LikeLiked by 2 people