No see, I think he’s probably from the same pagan heritage that worships some Canaanite deity. Oh what’s that called…Oh right…cough…Christianity. Hahahaha!
Worship by circling around a building like the pagans? Is that what you mean?
Worship by kissing a black stone like the pagans did?
😂😂
Canaanite deity? Is that what you say to the Jews as well? I guess it’s a shame when the Koran affirms our Torah and gospels that you feel the need to contradict your deity. But that’s your MO these days. You’re halariously cute in your attempts to be civilised 😂😂
When all else fails and there is no where to go, say that the Quran affirms the Torah and all your troubles will go away!
Poor, poor Cerbie. Haven’t you gotten tired of being exposed as an ignoramus? Do you enjoy being humiliated, you canine masochist? Your Bible borrows from Canaanite mythology. I have schooled you on this before and you could nothing but dance and then run off. Do you have any actual response to why your Bible borrows from Canaanite myth? Deflecting to the Quran does nothing for you. It just embarrasses you further. So try again, Cerbie. Why does your god have the same traits as El, the Canaanite high god?
Oh dear, bringing up old themes that you lost on to save face again? Trying to deflect from your pagan rituals? You do love to run and hide, don’t you? 😂😂😂
Still no response??? Come on, Cerbie! Defend your Canaanite god! Why do you keep running?
Why is your god an old man like El? Why does Jacob invoke Canaanite goddesses in Genesis? What kind of confused book do you follow? Let’s see where you go from here…I can’t wait! 🙂
“Worship by circling around a building like the pagans? Is that what you mean?
Worship by kissing a black stone like the pagans did?”
Do we worship the kabaa? No
In what language was the NT written? Greek
Who wrote the gospels? We don’t know but it was in Greek.
Do you worship a man? Yes
Is this what the Greeks/Romans used to do? Yes
Awww, what happened Cerbie? Couldn’t find anything in your frantic search to save your religion from its pagan origins? Why is your god an old man? Why does Genesis evoke pagan goddesses? Can’t solve the riddle? Here’s a little hint: Genesis 49. 😉
Look how angry the pagan muhammadan gets at the fact that true unadulterated monotheism is found only in christianity. He just repeats refuted polemics non stop 😂😂😂
He’s so desperate to change the topic.
What’s the matter, don’t want to admit that your obliged to circle objects and kiss a stone like your pagan ancestry did before your child rapist prophet?
Still running with your tail between your legs? I know, little doggie. The humiliation has been terrible for you. Finding out that your god allowed little girls to be taken as slaves. Finding out that your god is an old man. Finding out that there invocations to pagan goddesses in your confused “scripture”. Its too much for you…poor doggie. Did you check out Genesis 49 yet? I’m still waiting for your spine to grow. I think it might take until the coming of the kingdom of God. Oh wait, that was supposed to happen 2000 years ago. Nevermind. Bwahahahaha!
Arguments? As in the bible apparently borrows something?
Hmm, and yet you muhammadans strangely ignore the apocryphal fables your Koran borrows. That’s what happens with a camel loving arab trader as your prophet. He had no idea what he was saying! And the uneducated Arabs lapped it up! 😂😂 so let’s call a little bit of hypocrisy from the muhammadan team on this one.
Then you circle a building and kiss a stone. Just like the pagans!!
So borrows myths and pagan rituals. Islam 101. Its *almost* pure monotheism 😂😂
Finally! The crosstian admits that his Bible borrows from pagan mythology! Yay, we’re making progress! Let’s give the doggie a round of applause for finally seeing the light!
Oh but the poor clod tried to change the subject to Islam again. Not so fast, Cerbie. Your Bible borrows from Canaanite mythology by:
1. Using descriptions of El as an old man and applying it to Yahweh (Daniel 7).
2. Evoking pagan goddesses in a prayer allegedly said by Jacob (Genesis 49).
3. Describing a sea monster called “Leviathan”, which was a mythical monster in Canaanite myth.
4. Describing the “son of man” as receiving his kingdom from Yahweh (Daniel 7), similar to how Baal received his kingdom from El after defeating Yam, the sea-god.
Hmm, let’s see. Is there anything else? This is just the tip of the iceberg.
Hahahaha look who won’t face his hypocrisy. But instead just appeals to the same nonsense over and over. Just like the Koran! Ha! No wonder you love being a muhammad worshipper.
I wasn’t talking about what Q&B said you idiot.
You kan bring up the kabaa as much as you like but we don’t worship it. You on the other hand worship a man. And btw your own bible says the Israelites prayed towards the Temple. So bowing down towards the Temple must be pagan as well then. I can’t wait for the pathetic attempts like ‘O but it doesn’t say that they were circumventing the Temple’.
Doesn’t matter. You lost kiddo. Go worship your mangod now which doesn’t exist.
“Hahahaha look who won’t face his hypocrisy. But instead just appeals to the same nonsense over and over. Just like the Koran! Ha! No wonder you love being a muhammad worshipper.”
Hahahaha, look who won’t face his book’s covert paganism and instead appeals to pathetic nonsense against Islam! No wonder you are a man-worshipping crosstian!!
Your Bible borrows from Canaanite mythology by:
1. Using descriptions of El as an old man and applying it to Yahweh (Daniel 7).
2. Evoking pagan goddesses in a prayer allegedly said by Jacob (Genesis 49).
3. Describing a sea monster called “Leviathan”, which was a mythical monster in Canaanite myth.
4. Describing the “son of man” as receiving his kingdom from Yahweh (Daniel 7), similar to how Baal received his kingdom from El after defeating Yam, the sea-god.
My goodness what an awful comment. He is a person who is in desperate need of a heart transplant.
Such vile hatred is not good for the soul, here is the solution:
The Authority Of Abu Hurairah
The messenger of Allah said : “Each person’s every joint must perform a charity every day the sun comes up : to act justly between two people is a charity; to help a man with his mount, lifting him onto it or hoistingd up his belongings onto it is a charity: a good word is a charity, every step you take to prayers is a charity and removing a harmful thing from the road is a charity.”
Reporters. Related by Bukhari and Muslim.
An Nawawi Hadith Number 025
Someone named “PaganSwed” complaining about a people’s violent history is hilarious. Looks like somebody doesn’t have access to the History Channel 😂😂😂
Hey Atlas, lookie here! Cerbie’s help finally arrived!
“Females could only be given in marriage as debt slaves in the law of Moses. Not as children.”
Oh brother, another Christian trying to cover-up what his Bible actually says. Cerbie already tried this, Ignoramus. And boy did he try! But alas, I showed him proof that these were young girls who were taken as slaves.
The book “Ancient Christian Commentary on Scripture: Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, Deuteronomy” (p. 260), quotes the church father Augustine as stating that “…in the proper usage of the Hebrew language all females are habitually called women”.
So there goes Cerbie’s pathetic defense against his Bible’s depravity. The “women” described in verse 35 were in fact young children, but the Bible still refers to them as “women”. It doesn’t change the fact that they were young, virgin girls.
And here is an admission from another Christian source:
“Finally- the muhammadan admits that they weren’t raped nine year olds like his beloved Aisha!!
It took a while, but the truth finally gets revealed.”
Bwhahahaha, Cerbie is completely deluded! Still in denial about the fact that your god allowed the rape of young, virgin girls?
I completely demolished your lie that they were “women”, based on your obsession with verse 35. The learned scholars of your religion understood that just because one verse refers to them as “women” does not change the fact that they were very young girls. Then I showed you an admission from a more honest Christian source that young girls were considered old enough for sexual intercourse. Thus, when combing the textual evidence and simple logic (which we know our canine friend Cerbie completely lacks), we come to the conclusion that your pagan god allowed the rape of young girls. The men and boys were all killed, and so were the non-virgin women. The only group that is left is young girls. The poor man-worshiper is still clinging to his pathetic excuses, whereas the more learned members of his religion have admitted the undeniable truth. Poor, poor crosstian.
The only person deluded is you little pork chop. Your “sources” at best demonstrate they were teenagers, and only then sometimes, not nine year old girls. I’m happy to accept that since it demolishes your lies nonetheless to defend muhammad.
Furthermore, the text says nothing about rape. That’s your little muhammadan interpolation because you are ashamed that your example raped a nine year old girl.
Bwahahhaha- poor little muhammadan humiliated again
“The only person deluded is you little pork chop. Your “sources” at best demonstrate they were teenagers, and only then sometimes, not nine year old girls. I’m happy to accept that since it demolishes your lies nonetheless to defend muhammad.”
Hahahaha, so Cerbie finally admits the truth! They weren’t “women” after all!
Oh but an admission by Cerbie wouldn’t be complete without his own pathetic excuse-making. So, it was okay to take teenage girls as slaves??? Hypocrisy much, Cerbie? What difference does it make if they were not 9 years old, and were instead 12 years old?
Moreover, you are assuming that they were all teenagers, but that is not necessarily the case. As I showed, the word in question means “children”. That would include young girls of any age. You’re just too embarrassed to admit it.
“Furthermore, the text says nothing about rape. That’s your little muhammadan interpolation because you are ashamed that your example raped a nine year old girl.
Bwahahhaha- poor little muhammadan humiliated again”
LOL, the deluded crosstian thinks he has saved his Bible. In fact, you destroyed it completely by showing the depravity!
Naturally, because you are so embarrassed, you now are denying that these girls were taken as sex slaves. I’m sure you prefer to think that they were taken as “maids” or something, like most modern interpreters, but the fact is that there was nothing in Biblical law that prohibited taking wives as young as 10 years old, and maybe even younger. That is why the rabbis estimated Rebekkah’s age to be between 8 and 14 years old when she married Isaac.
Bwhahahaha, Cerbie the dog of hell is humiliated again!!
You still trying to save face? You’re so humiliated you think a 12 year old is a teenager! You are so desperate to lower the age as much as possible to try and defend a 54 year old raping a nine year old. Your prophet.
Now, take off your muhammadan spectacles. I said I would happily accept the premise of the source you cited that said the virgin women sometimes were teenagers. Not that I necessarily agree with it, but I’ll accept it for the sake of argument to demolish your pathetic attempts to defend old no marrying a child bride.
Then you still moan and abandon this said source to try and argue that they were actually children. Do you have no honesty? You’re still labouring a lost point- the noun “young” is paralleled with women against the married women. Ergo, virgins. Not kids.
Now, please stop embarrassing yourself and abandon you came urine drinking child raping prophet. You’ll feel much better once you do and you’ll be far less angry.
LOL Cerbie, don’t you think you’ve made enough of a fool of yourself? The Hebrew word in Numbers 31 means CHILDREN, not TEENAGERS. So, the girls that were taken as slaves would have been in a diverse range of ages. They could have included teenagers, but not necessarily so. Here it is again:
NAS Exhaustive Concordance
Word Origin
from taphaph
Definition
children
NASB Translation
children (11), girls* (1), infants (1), little children (2), little ones (27).
Here is another explanation from the Brown-Driver-Briggs Hebrew and English Lexicon:
“…here note זָכָר בַּטָּ֑ף Numbers 31:17 = young boys, and הַטַף בַּנָּשִׁים Numbers 31:18 = young girls;”
See? Just accept the truth, you moron. You god had all the Midianites killed except for the female children. That is what the text says. The men were killed. The boys were killed. The women were killed. Who is left? Stop beating around the bush you man-worshiping pagan! You have been humiliated over and over again in this discussion. Your delusions will not save you. Hahahahaha!!!
You do realise that you are relying on a semantic fallacy. Words get their meaning from the context.
I’ve told you already. You’d be correct if the word “women” wasn’t there and if it wasn’t contrasted against the married women. Who’s left? Unmarried women. Virgins.
Appealing to what a word *can* mean does not equate to demonstrating that it does mean that in this context. Thus far, you’ve not attempted to deal with context. Why? Cause it don’t suit your muhammadan cause to defend the rape of nine year old Aisha.
The only embarrassment is your juvenile reluctance to admit when your wrong. Even the sources you cited as proof didn’t prove your point. It’s a lost cause. Just like Islam.
Now, back to kissing your stone little pagan…(I’m sure you practice in front of the mirror for the hope of perfecting your craft before embarking on hajj)
What I realize is that you are a lying, man-worshiping little twirp. You’ve abundantly proven that with you’re constant backtracking and moving of the goalposts.
I have shown you direct evidence what the word means, you idiot. You just don’t like the truth, so you are dancing around it. If everyone was killed (men, non-virgin women, boys), then obviously only the girls are left. Stop dancing around the obvious. Your lies will not fool anyone, except yourself. Your pathetic excuses only damage your reputation and your religion more and more. Hahahahaha!
NAS Exhaustive Concordance
Word Origin
from taphaph
Definition
children
NASB Translation children (11), girls* (1), infants (1), little children (2), little ones (27).
Indeed it does. You morons tried to claim that these girls were grown “women”. Now that the truth has been established, you are so deluded and arrogant that you cannot admit that you are wrong and that your criticisms against Muhammad (pbuh) simply don’t hold water. But you are Christians, so it explains why you are such idiots! ROFTL!!
Blogging Theology 
The commenter’s level of hateful ignorance is what is absolutely pathetic.
LikeLike
paulus
LikeLiked by 2 people
Sounds like one of Cerbie’s distant cousins.
LikeLiked by 1 person
*paganSwed*
Clearly, his/her heritage is more akin to muhammadism 😂😂
LikeLike
No see, I think he’s probably from the same pagan heritage that worships some Canaanite deity. Oh what’s that called…Oh right…cough…Christianity. Hahahaha!
LikeLike
Worship by circling around a building like the pagans? Is that what you mean?
Worship by kissing a black stone like the pagans did?
😂😂
Canaanite deity? Is that what you say to the Jews as well? I guess it’s a shame when the Koran affirms our Torah and gospels that you feel the need to contradict your deity. But that’s your MO these days. You’re halariously cute in your attempts to be civilised 😂😂
LikeLike
Hahahaha, what a typical response!
When all else fails and there is no where to go, say that the Quran affirms the Torah and all your troubles will go away!
Poor, poor Cerbie. Haven’t you gotten tired of being exposed as an ignoramus? Do you enjoy being humiliated, you canine masochist? Your Bible borrows from Canaanite mythology. I have schooled you on this before and you could nothing but dance and then run off. Do you have any actual response to why your Bible borrows from Canaanite myth? Deflecting to the Quran does nothing for you. It just embarrasses you further. So try again, Cerbie. Why does your god have the same traits as El, the Canaanite high god?
LikeLike
Oh dear, bringing up old themes that you lost on to save face again? Trying to deflect from your pagan rituals? You do love to run and hide, don’t you? 😂😂😂
LikeLike
Still no response??? Come on, Cerbie! Defend your Canaanite god! Why do you keep running?
Why is your god an old man like El? Why does Jacob invoke Canaanite goddesses in Genesis? What kind of confused book do you follow? Let’s see where you go from here…I can’t wait! 🙂
LikeLike
“Worship by circling around a building like the pagans? Is that what you mean?
Worship by kissing a black stone like the pagans did?”
Do we worship the kabaa? No
In what language was the NT written? Greek
Who wrote the gospels? We don’t know but it was in Greek.
Do you worship a man? Yes
Is this what the Greeks/Romans used to do? Yes
Bitchslap!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Lol, Cerbie gets crushed yet again!
LikeLike
Look at dumb and dumber here trying to defend their pagan religious practices.
Now now little girls, back to kissing a stone you go…
LikeLike
Awww, what happened Cerbie? Couldn’t find anything in your frantic search to save your religion from its pagan origins? Why is your god an old man? Why does Genesis evoke pagan goddesses? Can’t solve the riddle? Here’s a little hint: Genesis 49. 😉
LikeLike
Look how angry the pagan muhammadan gets at the fact that true unadulterated monotheism is found only in christianity. He just repeats refuted polemics non stop 😂😂😂
He’s so desperate to change the topic.
What’s the matter, don’t want to admit that your obliged to circle objects and kiss a stone like your pagan ancestry did before your child rapist prophet?
You can run but you can’t hide!
LikeLike
Still running with your tail between your legs? I know, little doggie. The humiliation has been terrible for you. Finding out that your god allowed little girls to be taken as slaves. Finding out that your god is an old man. Finding out that there invocations to pagan goddesses in your confused “scripture”. Its too much for you…poor doggie. Did you check out Genesis 49 yet? I’m still waiting for your spine to grow. I think it might take until the coming of the kingdom of God. Oh wait, that was supposed to happen 2000 years ago. Nevermind. Bwahahahaha!
LikeLike
As always the loser couldn’t deal with the arguments.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Arguments? As in the bible apparently borrows something?
Hmm, and yet you muhammadans strangely ignore the apocryphal fables your Koran borrows. That’s what happens with a camel loving arab trader as your prophet. He had no idea what he was saying! And the uneducated Arabs lapped it up! 😂😂 so let’s call a little bit of hypocrisy from the muhammadan team on this one.
Then you circle a building and kiss a stone. Just like the pagans!!
So borrows myths and pagan rituals. Islam 101. Its *almost* pure monotheism 😂😂
LikeLike
“As in the bible apparently borrows something?”
Finally! The crosstian admits that his Bible borrows from pagan mythology! Yay, we’re making progress! Let’s give the doggie a round of applause for finally seeing the light!
Oh but the poor clod tried to change the subject to Islam again. Not so fast, Cerbie. Your Bible borrows from Canaanite mythology by:
1. Using descriptions of El as an old man and applying it to Yahweh (Daniel 7).
2. Evoking pagan goddesses in a prayer allegedly said by Jacob (Genesis 49).
3. Describing a sea monster called “Leviathan”, which was a mythical monster in Canaanite myth.
4. Describing the “son of man” as receiving his kingdom from Yahweh (Daniel 7), similar to how Baal received his kingdom from El after defeating Yam, the sea-god.
Hmm, let’s see. Is there anything else? This is just the tip of the iceberg.
LikeLike
Hahahaha look who won’t face his hypocrisy. But instead just appeals to the same nonsense over and over. Just like the Koran! Ha! No wonder you love being a muhammad worshipper.
LikeLike
I wasn’t talking about what Q&B said you idiot.
You kan bring up the kabaa as much as you like but we don’t worship it. You on the other hand worship a man. And btw your own bible says the Israelites prayed towards the Temple. So bowing down towards the Temple must be pagan as well then. I can’t wait for the pathetic attempts like ‘O but it doesn’t say that they were circumventing the Temple’.
Doesn’t matter. You lost kiddo. Go worship your mangod now which doesn’t exist.
LikeLiked by 1 person
“Hahahaha look who won’t face his hypocrisy. But instead just appeals to the same nonsense over and over. Just like the Koran! Ha! No wonder you love being a muhammad worshipper.”
Hahahaha, look who won’t face his book’s covert paganism and instead appeals to pathetic nonsense against Islam! No wonder you are a man-worshipping crosstian!!
Your Bible borrows from Canaanite mythology by:
1. Using descriptions of El as an old man and applying it to Yahweh (Daniel 7).
2. Evoking pagan goddesses in a prayer allegedly said by Jacob (Genesis 49).
3. Describing a sea monster called “Leviathan”, which was a mythical monster in Canaanite myth.
4. Describing the “son of man” as receiving his kingdom from Yahweh (Daniel 7), similar to how Baal received his kingdom from El after defeating Yam, the sea-god.
LikeLike
Must have touched a raw nerve there….
LikeLiked by 1 person
several
LikeLiked by 2 people
god is love. jesus love you. but that idiot dont agree with.
LikeLike
My goodness what an awful comment. He is a person who is in desperate need of a heart transplant.
Such vile hatred is not good for the soul, here is the solution:
The Authority Of Abu Hurairah
The messenger of Allah said : “Each person’s every joint must perform a charity every day the sun comes up : to act justly between two people is a charity; to help a man with his mount, lifting him onto it or hoistingd up his belongings onto it is a charity: a good word is a charity, every step you take to prayers is a charity and removing a harmful thing from the road is a charity.”
Reporters. Related by Bukhari and Muslim.
An Nawawi Hadith Number 025
LikeLiked by 2 people
😂🤣😆😎 he mad
LikeLike
Someone named “PaganSwed” complaining about a people’s violent history is hilarious. Looks like somebody doesn’t have access to the History Channel 😂😂😂
LikeLiked by 1 person
“Finding out that your god allowed little girls to be taken as slaves. ”
Females could only be given in marriage as debt slaves in the law of Moses. Not as children.
LikeLike
Hey Atlas, lookie here! Cerbie’s help finally arrived!
“Females could only be given in marriage as debt slaves in the law of Moses. Not as children.”
Oh brother, another Christian trying to cover-up what his Bible actually says. Cerbie already tried this, Ignoramus. And boy did he try! But alas, I showed him proof that these were young girls who were taken as slaves.
The book “Ancient Christian Commentary on Scripture: Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, Deuteronomy” (p. 260), quotes the church father Augustine as stating that “…in the proper usage of the Hebrew language all females are habitually called women”.
So there goes Cerbie’s pathetic defense against his Bible’s depravity. The “women” described in verse 35 were in fact young children, but the Bible still refers to them as “women”. It doesn’t change the fact that they were young, virgin girls.
And here is an admission from another Christian source:
“Ancient women had one career path: being wives and mothers… and they began these careers early in life by our standards — often as young teens. But this was how the economy worked back then… and it worked that way for most of human history. So, we should not judge those ancient societies by today’s more egalitarian standards” (http://www.mainsailministries.org/index.php/q-a-a-god-bible-theology-culture/415-why-did-god-spare-the-young-girls-in-numbers-31.html).
LikeLike
Finally- the muhammadan admits that they weren’t raped nine year olds like his beloved Aisha!!
It took a while, but the truth finally gets revealed.
LikeLike
“Finally- the muhammadan admits that they weren’t raped nine year olds like his beloved Aisha!!
It took a while, but the truth finally gets revealed.”
Bwhahahaha, Cerbie is completely deluded! Still in denial about the fact that your god allowed the rape of young, virgin girls?
I completely demolished your lie that they were “women”, based on your obsession with verse 35. The learned scholars of your religion understood that just because one verse refers to them as “women” does not change the fact that they were very young girls. Then I showed you an admission from a more honest Christian source that young girls were considered old enough for sexual intercourse. Thus, when combing the textual evidence and simple logic (which we know our canine friend Cerbie completely lacks), we come to the conclusion that your pagan god allowed the rape of young girls. The men and boys were all killed, and so were the non-virgin women. The only group that is left is young girls. The poor man-worshiper is still clinging to his pathetic excuses, whereas the more learned members of his religion have admitted the undeniable truth. Poor, poor crosstian.
LikeLike
The only person deluded is you little pork chop. Your “sources” at best demonstrate they were teenagers, and only then sometimes, not nine year old girls. I’m happy to accept that since it demolishes your lies nonetheless to defend muhammad.
Furthermore, the text says nothing about rape. That’s your little muhammadan interpolation because you are ashamed that your example raped a nine year old girl.
Bwahahhaha- poor little muhammadan humiliated again
LikeLiked by 1 person
“The only person deluded is you little pork chop. Your “sources” at best demonstrate they were teenagers, and only then sometimes, not nine year old girls. I’m happy to accept that since it demolishes your lies nonetheless to defend muhammad.”
Hahahaha, so Cerbie finally admits the truth! They weren’t “women” after all!
Oh but an admission by Cerbie wouldn’t be complete without his own pathetic excuse-making. So, it was okay to take teenage girls as slaves??? Hypocrisy much, Cerbie? What difference does it make if they were not 9 years old, and were instead 12 years old?
Moreover, you are assuming that they were all teenagers, but that is not necessarily the case. As I showed, the word in question means “children”. That would include young girls of any age. You’re just too embarrassed to admit it.
“Furthermore, the text says nothing about rape. That’s your little muhammadan interpolation because you are ashamed that your example raped a nine year old girl.
Bwahahhaha- poor little muhammadan humiliated again”
LOL, the deluded crosstian thinks he has saved his Bible. In fact, you destroyed it completely by showing the depravity!
Naturally, because you are so embarrassed, you now are denying that these girls were taken as sex slaves. I’m sure you prefer to think that they were taken as “maids” or something, like most modern interpreters, but the fact is that there was nothing in Biblical law that prohibited taking wives as young as 10 years old, and maybe even younger. That is why the rabbis estimated Rebekkah’s age to be between 8 and 14 years old when she married Isaac.
Bwhahahaha, Cerbie the dog of hell is humiliated again!!
LikeLike
You still trying to save face? You’re so humiliated you think a 12 year old is a teenager! You are so desperate to lower the age as much as possible to try and defend a 54 year old raping a nine year old. Your prophet.
Now, take off your muhammadan spectacles. I said I would happily accept the premise of the source you cited that said the virgin women sometimes were teenagers. Not that I necessarily agree with it, but I’ll accept it for the sake of argument to demolish your pathetic attempts to defend old no marrying a child bride.
Then you still moan and abandon this said source to try and argue that they were actually children. Do you have no honesty? You’re still labouring a lost point- the noun “young” is paralleled with women against the married women. Ergo, virgins. Not kids.
Now, please stop embarrassing yourself and abandon you came urine drinking child raping prophet. You’ll feel much better once you do and you’ll be far less angry.
LikeLike
LOL Cerbie, don’t you think you’ve made enough of a fool of yourself? The Hebrew word in Numbers 31 means CHILDREN, not TEENAGERS. So, the girls that were taken as slaves would have been in a diverse range of ages. They could have included teenagers, but not necessarily so. Here it is again:
NAS Exhaustive Concordance
Word Origin
from taphaph
Definition
children
NASB Translation
children (11), girls* (1), infants (1), little children (2), little ones (27).
Here is another explanation from the Brown-Driver-Briggs Hebrew and English Lexicon:
“…here note זָכָר בַּטָּ֑ף Numbers 31:17 = young boys, and הַטַף בַּנָּשִׁים Numbers 31:18 = young girls;”
See? Just accept the truth, you moron. You god had all the Midianites killed except for the female children. That is what the text says. The men were killed. The boys were killed. The women were killed. Who is left? Stop beating around the bush you man-worshiping pagan! You have been humiliated over and over again in this discussion. Your delusions will not save you. Hahahahaha!!!
LikeLike
You do realise that you are relying on a semantic fallacy. Words get their meaning from the context.
I’ve told you already. You’d be correct if the word “women” wasn’t there and if it wasn’t contrasted against the married women. Who’s left? Unmarried women. Virgins.
Appealing to what a word *can* mean does not equate to demonstrating that it does mean that in this context. Thus far, you’ve not attempted to deal with context. Why? Cause it don’t suit your muhammadan cause to defend the rape of nine year old Aisha.
The only embarrassment is your juvenile reluctance to admit when your wrong. Even the sources you cited as proof didn’t prove your point. It’s a lost cause. Just like Islam.
Now, back to kissing your stone little pagan…(I’m sure you practice in front of the mirror for the hope of perfecting your craft before embarking on hajj)
LikeLike
What I realize is that you are a lying, man-worshiping little twirp. You’ve abundantly proven that with you’re constant backtracking and moving of the goalposts.
I have shown you direct evidence what the word means, you idiot. You just don’t like the truth, so you are dancing around it. If everyone was killed (men, non-virgin women, boys), then obviously only the girls are left. Stop dancing around the obvious. Your lies will not fool anyone, except yourself. Your pathetic excuses only damage your reputation and your religion more and more. Hahahahaha!
LikeLike
The text itself determines what it is saying. So you have not provided proof of anything.
LikeLike
Yes, so let’s look at the text, shall we?
the girls הַטַּ֣ף hat·taf 2945 children from taphaph
http://biblehub.com/lexicon/numbers/31-18.htm
NAS Exhaustive Concordance
Word Origin
from taphaph
Definition
children
NASB Translation
children (11), girls* (1), infants (1), little children (2), little ones (27).
http://biblehub.com/hebrew/2945.htm
So now, what was that you were saying about the “text itself determines what it is saying”?
You guys are pathetic. The extent you go to to hide what your own “scripture” says is amazing!
LikeLike
Paulus:
“Furthermore, the text says nothing about rape.
That’s your little muhammadan interpolation because you are ashamed that your example raped a nine year old girl.
Bwahahhaha- poor little muhammadan humiliated again.”
Well said Paulus. I agree. The truth hurts.
LikeLike
Indeed it does. You morons tried to claim that these girls were grown “women”. Now that the truth has been established, you are so deluded and arrogant that you cannot admit that you are wrong and that your criticisms against Muhammad (pbuh) simply don’t hold water. But you are Christians, so it explains why you are such idiots! ROFTL!!
LikeLike