William’s Buddy, the same way you reason that it is possible that Allah is literally God. in fact, could you reason why your god cannot literally have a son?
You said;
William’s Buddy, the same way you reason that it is possible that Allah is literally God. in fact, could you reason why your god cannot literally have a son?
I say;
Allah is the creator of everything and He is One, Only and Alone. Son is always a creation unless it is metaphorical and in that case it will disqualify Jesus as the only begotten Son/son because we are all metaphorical Sons/sons of God.
If it is not literal then it is metaphorical.
We are all metaphorical Sons/sons of Allah because He nourishes, take care of, provides, guides, feed us all like how fathers do. That is metaphorical. Any Good person like Jesus and the others are also called Sons/sons of God(Ahmed Deedat-Sons of God by tonnes)
If it is not metaphorical, then it is literal and it means having sexual intercourse to beget a Son/son.
So Allah does not have a literal Son/son but we are all metaphorical Sons/sons of God but not Jesus alone. If Jesus Sonship is not metaphorical like us, then it is literal and literal Sonshipi involves sex.
GOD CAN NOT LITERAL HAVE A SON BECAUSE LITERAL SON INVOLVES HAVING SEX TO BEGET A SON. God forbid. Any one who perceives such thinking has committed a great sin and needs repentance.
You said;
Williams, you mean the same millions of Christians who worship “Allah” as Father, Son and Holy Spirit? Those same Christians?
I say;
God is Father to anyone but not Christians alone because He does not have sex with Christians mothers to give birth to them(Christians). Did God(May God forbid) slept with your mother to give birth to you? but not me? to claim His(God) Father hood alone? and cast me out. Prove to me where God(May God forbid) had sex with your mother.
“So the Muslim seeks clarification of the teaching and asks at every step: “How could that be so?”
For example, we insist that the term “Son of God” cannot have a literal interpretation.
Sonship and divine nature would be necessary attributes of such an actuality, but these are incompatible.
The first describes a recipient of life while the second describes One who received life from no one.
These are mutually exclusive requirements then.
To be a son is to be less than divine, and to be divine is to be no one’s son.”
Gary Miller, “A Concise Reply To Christianity – A Muslim View”
Blogging Theology 
There are folks out there who claim Jesus was the Son of God literally
LikeLiked by 1 person
very annoying
LikeLike
And there are folk who say that Allah is God literally.
LikeLike
Yes Sam…Millions of Christians call on “Allah” literally in their prayers.
LikeLike
And that is very annoying indeed!
LikeLike
Buddy’s Wood, could you reason how a literal son of God is possible?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Williams, you mean the same millions of Christians who worship “Allah” as Father, Son and Holy Spirit? Those same Christians?
LikeLike
William’s Buddy, the same way you reason that it is possible that Allah is literally God. in fact, could you reason why your god cannot literally have a son?
LikeLike
Wood’s Buddy
You said;
William’s Buddy, the same way you reason that it is possible that Allah is literally God. in fact, could you reason why your god cannot literally have a son?
I say;
Allah is the creator of everything and He is One, Only and Alone. Son is always a creation unless it is metaphorical and in that case it will disqualify Jesus as the only begotten Son/son because we are all metaphorical Sons/sons of God.
If it is not literal then it is metaphorical.
We are all metaphorical Sons/sons of Allah because He nourishes, take care of, provides, guides, feed us all like how fathers do. That is metaphorical. Any Good person like Jesus and the others are also called Sons/sons of God(Ahmed Deedat-Sons of God by tonnes)
If it is not metaphorical, then it is literal and it means having sexual intercourse to beget a Son/son.
So Allah does not have a literal Son/son but we are all metaphorical Sons/sons of God but not Jesus alone. If Jesus Sonship is not metaphorical like us, then it is literal and literal Sonshipi involves sex.
GOD CAN NOT LITERAL HAVE A SON BECAUSE LITERAL SON INVOLVES HAVING SEX TO BEGET A SON. God forbid. Any one who perceives such thinking has committed a great sin and needs repentance.
You said;
Williams, you mean the same millions of Christians who worship “Allah” as Father, Son and Holy Spirit? Those same Christians?
I say;
God is Father to anyone but not Christians alone because He does not have sex with Christians mothers to give birth to them(Christians). Did God(May God forbid) slept with your mother to give birth to you? but not me? to claim His(God) Father hood alone? and cast me out. Prove to me where God(May God forbid) had sex with your mother.
Thanks.
LikeLike
I am still waiting for William’s buddy, a.k.a. Burhan a.k.a. Kurt, to answer my question.
LikeLike
Patience Sam, patience.
‘for William’s buddy’ – should be Williams’
LikeLiked by 1 person
Does Allah literally have hands or only metaphorically?
LikeLike
^ Metaphorically.
Back to the picture, I am literally the worst person ever for doing this 😮
LikeLiked by 1 person
Buddy’s Wood, so you cannot give one reason how a literal son of God is possible? Of course you can not.
But you try to weasel your way out on the tu quoque fallacy road – as usual. Megafail.
LikeLike
@ Wood’s Buddy
“So the Muslim seeks clarification of the teaching and asks at every step: “How could that be so?”
For example, we insist that the term “Son of God” cannot have a literal interpretation.
Sonship and divine nature would be necessary attributes of such an actuality, but these are incompatible.
The first describes a recipient of life while the second describes One who received life from no one.
These are mutually exclusive requirements then.
To be a son is to be less than divine, and to be divine is to be no one’s son.”
Gary Miller, “A Concise Reply To Christianity – A Muslim View”
LikeLiked by 1 person
Nice quote
LikeLike