Maajid Nawaz – the founding chairman of Quilliam. The Southern Poverty Law Centre, which tracks racial hate crime in the US, lists Maajid Naaz as an “anti-Muslim extremist”

Maajid Nawaz is a British activist and part of the “ex-radical” circuit of former Islamists who use that experience to savage Islam. His story, which has been told repeatedly in the British and American press and in testimony to legislators as well, sounds compelling enough — Nawaz says he grew up being attacked by neo-Nazi skinheads in the United Kingdom, spent almost four years in an Egyptian prison after joining a supposedly nonviolent Islamist group, but had a change of heart while imprisoned and then returned to England to work against the radicalization of Muslims. But major elements of his story have been disputed by former friends, members of his family, fellow jihadists and journalists, and the evidence suggests that Nawaz is far more interested in self-promotion and money than in any particular ideological dispute. He told several different versions of his story, emphasizing that he was deradicalized while in Egypt — even though he in fact continued his Islamist agitation for months after returning. After starting the Quilliam Foundation, which he describes as an anti-extremism think tank, Nawaz sent a secret list to a top British security official that accused “peaceful Muslim groups, politicians, a television channel and a Scotland Yard unit of sharing the ideology of terrorists,” according to The Guardian. His Quilliam Foundation received more than 1.25 million pounds from the British government, but the government eventually decided to stop funding it. One of Nawaz’s biggest purported coups was getting anti-Muslim extremist Tommy Robinson to quit as head of the violence-prone English Defence League, trumpeting his departure at a press conference. But Robinson later said Quilliam had paid him some 8,000 British pounds to allow Nawaz to take credit for what he already planned to do. Shortly afterward, Robinson returned to anti-Muslim agitation with other groups.
IN HIS OWN WORDS
- In the list sent to a top British security official in 2010, headlined “Preventing Terrorism: Where Next for Britain?” Quilliam wrote, “The ideology of non-violent Islamists is broadly the same as that of violent Islamists; they disagree only on tactics.” An official with Scotland Yard’s Muslim Contact Unit told The Guardian that “[t]he list demonises a whole range of groups that in my experience have made valuable contributions to counter-terrorism.”
- In a Nov. 16, 2013, op-ed in the Daily Mail, Nawaz called for criminalizing the wearing of the veil, or niqab, in many public places, saying: “It is not only reasonable, but our duty to insist individuals remove the veil when they enter identity-sensitive environments such as banks, airports, courts and schools.”
- According to a Jan. 24, 2014, report in The Guardian, Nawaz tweeted out a cartoon of Jesus and Muhammad — despite the fact that many Muslims see it as blasphemous to draw Muhammad. He said that he wanted “to carve out a space to be heard without constantly fearing the blasphemy charge.”
- Nawaz, who had described himself as a “feminist,” was “filmed repeatedly trying to touch a naked lap dancer,” according to an April 10, 2015, report in the Daily Mail. The paper apparently got the security film from the owner of a strip club who was incensed by Nawaz’s claims to be a religious Muslim.
Categories: Extremism, Islamophobia
This guy has been funded by the enemies of Islam/Peace much like the other idiot Anjem Choudrey. Both puppets that get dragged out for fake debates to continue the narrative in the media. Two sides of the same coin.
Both of them massive hypocrits
LikeLike
Although I may not agree with Anjem on everything I find his public work to have been very good. He was basically the only person who could argue a non-mainstream version of Islam without looking like a lunatic.
LikeLike
Rider
The Nazis built great roads!
LikeLike
What’s so bad about Anjem from a Christian point of view?
Anjem used to see terrorist attacks as a reaction to wars in Muslim countries and did not condone them at least officially.
LikeLike
He wants to kill apostates.
LikeLike
Well, that’s a point if they are apostates from Islam to Christianity. But would you also have a problem with killing atheist apostates from Islam? And they are the majority of apostates from Islam.
LikeLike
Rider
Yes. Christians are not called to kill apostates or disbelievers.
LikeLike
Graham, I thought that was the Romans 😛
LikeLike
The romans built great baths and communal toilet facilities.
LikeLike
So if the historians are right who say Mary was about 12 years old when she got married what would be the basis of your objection to Muhammad’s marriage?
LikeLike
What does that have to do with communal toilets?
LikeLike