Jesus’ successors and legacy

Some insightful excerpts from The Jesus Dynasty by James D. Tabor, Professor of Religious Studies at the University of North Carolina. 

book

“Although the followers of Jesus reshaped themselves under the new leadership of James, and eventually returned to Jerusalem, there might well have been a period in which they retreated to Galilee in order to sort things out, and that is just what these gospel traditions appear to reflect. If that was the case then the more idealized account of the Jesus movement in the early chapters of the book of Acts is Luke’s attempt to recast things in a more triumphant way.” (p. 238)

“There are two completely separate and distinct ‘Christianities’ embedded in the New Testament. One is quite familiar and became the version of the Christian faith known to billions over the past two millennia. Its main proponent was the apostle Paul. The other has been largely forgotten and by the turn of the 1st century A.D. had been effectively marginalized and suppressed by the other.” (p. 259)

“The Nazarene movement, led by James, Peter, and John, was by any historical definition a Messianic Movement within Judaism. Even the term ‘Jewish-Christianity,’ though perhaps useful as a description of the original followers of Jesus, is really a misnomer since they never considered themselves anything but faithful Jews. In that sense early Christianity is Jewish.” (p. 264)

“I would go so far as to say that the New Testament itself is primarily a literary legacy of the apostle Paul.” (p. 270)

“There is no evidence that James worshipped his brother or considered him divine.” (p. 280)

“…[W]hat we can know, with some certainty, is that the royal family of Jesus, including the children and grandchildren of his brothers and sisters, were honored by the early Christians well into the 2nd century A.D., while at the same time they were watched and hunted down by the highest levels of the Roman government in Palestine.” (p. 290)

 



Categories: Bible, Christianity, History, Judaism, Quotation

2 replies

  1. For those interested, a review of the book (by Bert Jan Lietaert Peerbolte from Theological University Kampen) can be found here: http://www.bookreviews.org/bookdetail.asp?TitleId=5183&CodePage=5183.

    Like

  2. Oh no, another “Jesus had a roman father” author.
    Paul do you seriously think this book has any substance when the author manipulates archaeology and historical evidence?
    Those quotes aren’t even shocking. We know the apostle Paul was mainly the one reaching the Gentiles, yet his message doesn’t deviate from the gospels or the letters of James and Peter.
    And early Christianity being Jewish, there’s nothing surprising there. None of the New Testament authors distinguished themselves from Judaism, not even Paul. Just read Romans 11.

    Thanks for the link to the review Mark, well written by Peerbolte.

    Like

Leave a reply to Mark Cancel reply