I was wrong. Oh so very wrong.

Screen Shot 2015-09-08 at 18.49.43



Categories: Utterly idiotic

16 replies

  1. “Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. ”

    US Deceleration of Independence.

    Like

  2. You were not wrong, Paul. Assad is not a muslim so their argument about rebellion is void. Do not believe this apostate called Suleiman Ahmad.

    Like

  3. I have read much from Suleiman and I know that some of his positions are disbelief. Especially because he is very knowledgeable about religious texts and he changes facts deliberately.

    Like

  4. I see – give me an example of his ‘position’ that is disbelief.

    Like

  5. Some examples are: accepting Tahir Qadri as a Muslim and scholar/ accepting Assad as a Muslim/ accepting Alawites as Muslims/ being member of Labour/ denying the poll tax “jizya” for non-Muslims

    Like

  6. i just wanted one example thanks. It is not clear to me that any of these things entail Suleiman being an apostate.

    Like

  7. And once he shared a post of an ex-Muslim who criticized Islam and spoke bad directly about God/Allah. He said that is a true believer because of questioning false beliefs common Muslims have. Even if the criticism about Muslim behaviour was right it is clear apostasy to talk like that and to support it.

    Like

  8. is it clear apostasy? Are you are scholar? It is not at all clear to me that he has left Islam.

    Like

  9. Well for example no Muslim scholar could read one of Tahir ul Qadris books and consider him a Muslim without being an apostate himself. That is clear to everyone who has read what Tahir wrote.

    Like

  10. well it is not clear to me. And to say ‘no muslim scholar’ – have you done a survey?

    Like

  11. He is a scholar and therefore the Takfir can easily be done on him. Scholars cannot be excused with ignorance like common people. I would not make Takfir on normal people for the same things.

    Like

  12. you have not provided any evidence – just accusations. And takfiring scholars is a very serious thing to do. Are you a scholar? You sound like an extremist.

    Like

  13. Maybe when he brings the next statement of disbelief we can talk about it. I am no scholar but I learned about sensitive issues like Takfir. I practice much Takfir.

    The most important thing now is that all bad things that happened to Syrian people would have happened if Suleiman accepted that Assad is an infidel. Then he could not simply say the rebellion was prohibited since he says only rebellion against a Muslim ruler is not allowed.

    Like

Leave a reply to Paul Williams Cancel reply