Suspended, reprimanded, silenced, marginalised – Magistrate suspended from NHS Trust

Persecution of Christians for their beliefs is a sickening reality in Britain today.

From Christian Concern

Screen Shot 2016-03-29 at 22.37.11

A Christian magistrate, who was removed from the bench by the Lord Chancellor for his Biblical beliefs about marriage and family life, has since been suspended by an NHS Trust from his post as a non-executive director.

In yet another example of the way in which Christians are being forced out of public life for holding Bible-based beliefs Richard Page, 69, has been told by NHS bosses that he has been suspended from his position whilst the NHS Trust Development Authority “considers whether it is in the interests of the health service” for him to remain in his post.

Richard’s immediate suspension comes only three weeks after he was removed from office as a Justice of the Peace, after 15 years of loyal service to the Kent Magistrates bench.


Initiating the sequence of events which led to his suspension, Andrew Ling, Chair of the Kent and Medway NHS and Social Care Partnership Trust (KMPT) wrote to the NHS Trust Development Authority asking them to consider suspending Mr Page after his removal by the Lord Chancellor.

In the letter Mr Ling claims that Richard’s comments, and continuance as a Trust member would have a major impact on staff, patients and “the perception of living the Trust values”.

Mr Ling stated: “The recent publicity you have courted is likely to further undermine the confidence staff, particularly Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgendered (LGBT) staff, have in the leadership of the Trust”. He added: “Links between the stigma often associated with being LGBT and poor mental health are well established. It is vital that patients and local population are confident that KMPT will challenge stigma or discrimination and treat everyone fairly and impartially”.


Richard expressed his beliefs in late 2014, after hearing an adoption case. Richard could not agree with his fellow magistrates that placing a child into the care of a same-sex couple was ‘in the child’s best interest’.

He was then reported, reprimanded, and forced to attend ‘re-education training’.

In March last year, Richard spoke on a national television programme, stating that there was insufficient evidence to convince him that placing a child in the care of a same sex couple was in the child’s best interests.

Following his media comments, an investigation was carried out by a disciplinary panel, and he was eventually removed from office by the Lord Chief Justice and the Lord Chancellor.

Richard is appealing the decision to the Judicial Appointments Conduct Ombudsman, Sir John Brigstocke, and is suing the Lord Chancellor. He is being supported in his actions by the Christian Legal Centre.


Commenting on his suspension, Richard, who has worked in the field of mental health for 20 years, said:

“Two days ago, the Prime Minister distributed an Easter video in which he commended Christians, and the Church for their vital role in society, stating that we are a Christian country and should be proud of it.

However, his Government has brought in laws which effectively silence Christians and remove them from the public square. It would appear no longer possible to be a Christian, to state what the Bible actually says and what the Church has believed for 2,000 years, and maintain a role in public life in today’s Britain. My seat on the NHS Trust came as a result of my long service in mental health and total commitment to the NHS – none of that has changed.

“What the Prime Minister, Government and NHS Trust fail to recognise is that the reason why so many Christians make such a huge contribution to society – which they are all keen to acknowledge – is that we are all motivated to do so by our Christian faith and our love for Jesus Christ whose death and resurrection we remembered last weekend.”


Andrea Minichiello Williams, barrister and founder of the Christian Legal Centre added:

“For the past decade, we at the Christian Legal Centre have been warning that Christians are being marginalised and removed from public life. We have seen it in nursing, in counselling, in teaching, amongst Registrars and now we see it amongst Magistrates and NHS Trust Executives.

“It is time for MPs to take serious note and look afresh at the Equality legislation which was badly drafted and consistently gives more rights to some groups over those of the Christian faith. Yet once again we find Britain’s political leaders wiping their hands clean of Christians who are prepared to stand up for their faith. They take no responsibility for what is going on, blaming the Equality Act, citing ‘freedoms’ and talking of ‘diversity’ but it’s all hot air.

“It is time for MPs and the Government to wake up and see how Christians are being forced out of our nation’s public life, and to act before it is too late”

Categories: Christianity, Homosexuality, Life in the West

18 replies

  1. informal a thing or situation that is unpleasant or difficult to deal with : the stove is a bitch to fix. So, in the phrase karma is a bitch, the writer means: “When what goes around comes around, the situation can be difficult to deal with or fix.”


  2. Religious beliefs should not interfere with policy making.


  3. in a free society people should not be persecuted for holding Christian or (Muslim) beliefs

    Liked by 1 person

    • You’re right, they shouldn’t. Nor however, should those beliefs be imposed upon everyone else in situations where it isn’t warranted.


    • But very recent politically correct beliefs are being imposed on him and everyone else. You do not seem to mind that.


    • Are they though? If he made a commitment to work for a public office, which should by definition be neutral and not form policy based upon personal beliefs.

      I am reminded of an especially fundamentalist Christian site that espouses the notion of ‘special rights’ for the LBGT community, when actually all they want are the same rights as anyone else, without interference because someone decided their personal beliefs override everything else.


    • The belief that children are not best placed with a father and mother is hardly neutral and goes against common sense


    • If a same-sex couple go through the same vetting process as any other couple then why should they be denied the same opportunities as other couples?


    • God had ordained that children should have a mother and father. Current practice denies this reality and persecutes those who disagree. Children are being used/abused by liberal ideology


    • What if someone doesn’t believe in God, or they follow a different religion? Are they to be expected to abide by religious interference in their lives in those circumstances? Would you tolerate being forced to live by Christian ideals in what’s meant to be a secular country?


    • I would be very happy to live in a country run on Christian ideals!


    • Would you? Even if a state religion meant you weren’t permitted to practice your faith, or to have the freedom to have no faith? What if you were told you couldn’t have the job you wanted, or get married, or adopt, because of someone else’s belief system?


    • We can all think of repressive regimes that deny a persons faith. The UK now persecutes people of faith for holding heretical opinions, the gay extremists rule now.

      Liked by 1 person

    • I think that’s pretty far fetched to be honest. You are able to voice your opinions, freely and without constraint, precisely because we are as a nation a secular society. If any single religion were to dominate government policy, it would not end well for a lot of us.

      I hear a lot of talk about ‘the gay agenda’ and such. It’s a rallying cry for those who don’t like homosexuals and wish to deny them equality through the mantra of religious beliefs. I would ask – what rights have been taken away from anyone by permitting same-sex marriage? Religious institutions can opt out of performing ceremonies if they so wish; no one is being forced to get involved if they don’t want to. However, if you work for a government body or public business (which has made a commitment to abide by rules and regulations), you are agreeing to put your private beliefs to one side in the public arena, as it should be. To do otherwise is to open the door to all manners of exclusionary practices.


  4. before I reply, can I ask, are you a Christian or person of no faith?


  5. “WTF???”

    whoever has ears let him not hear and whoever doesn’t have ears let him hear


  6. To be honest, I am not sure where I stand. I see the appeal of some aspects of the Christian faith, but I find it hard to reconcile with certain things I have learned. For example, the idea of taking Young Earth Creationism as fact, based on a literal interpretation of the Bible, does not mesh with various scientific fields. I cannot approve of exclusionary policies built upon Biblical principles, which, for me, jar with what I’ve read of how Jesus himself approached things.


Please leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: