This is actually a deep vid. The reason for people’s conviction for atheism (…notice the terminology…) is ‘fitri’ [instinctive, belief] and not @@’aqli’ [rational]. This explains why even if you provide proofs for God, that is reasonable, plausible, some atheists shrug their shoulders and carry on with their polemics.
Blogging Theology 
This is actually a deep vid. The reason for people’s conviction for atheism (…notice the terminology…) is ‘fitri’ [instinctive, belief] and not @@’aqli’ [rational]. This explains why even if you provide proofs for God, that is reasonable, plausible, some atheists shrug their shoulders and carry on with their polemics.
The question is this. Is he right?
A good post, bro, for us to reflect on.
LikeLiked by 1 person
*correction: not sure where or why the ‘@’ came from!
LikeLike