‘The inherent hypocrisy and double-standards of liberalism’s accusations against Islam’

by Yasir Qadhi, just posted on Facebook 

Every few months, something happens that demonstrates the inherent hypocrisy and double-standards of liberalism’s accusations against Islam. Of them is the claim that Muslims don’t believe in ‘freedom of speech’ since we don’t accept people making fun of our sacred symbols.

Yet, as I have argued in many lectures, each and every society has its self-imposed taboos in speech that it does not transgress. And when it does, there are actual ramifications and repercussions, whether legal or societal.

Recently, a small unknown mattress company in Texas released an ad in which they advertised a 9/11 sale as a ‘Twin Towers’ sale, in which two employees fell over and caused two stacks of mattresses to collapse, and a lady says as the mattresses are falling, ‘We will never forget’.

It was a cheap, foolish, tacky ad. The actors and ad consultant obviously lacked intelligence, but clearly they didn’t intend to insult anyone.

Yet, the ad caused a national backlash. The small store had to shut down its business; its owners received death threats (along with thousands of abusive and foul-language messages); the parent company has unconditionally apologized and, to show how ‘sorry’ they are, will donate a large sum of money to some 9/11 cause.

One thing you will not find in all of this debacle is people championing the ‘freedom of speech’ card for this tacky ad. For some strange reason, all of a sudden this ‘fundamental value’ of Western liberalism to insult and to speak freely seems to be overlooked when it comes to specific issues.

If a tacky 9/11 ad provoked such a furious reaction and caused a business to shut down, is it really that difficult to understand that Muslims will indeed be even more angry when their Creator, or prophet, or book, are *intentionally* insulted and sacrilegiously denigrated?

True, such provocation should not result in physical harm, but the anger is fully expected and, indeed, a natural and logical reaction to a crude insult of an icon or symbol that is so revered and beloved by a people.

Again, the point of this post was to demonstrate that there is no such thing as ultimate free speech, anywhere in the world. Yes, there are differences to the Shariah’s understanding and a liberal understanding, but both draw lines, and both have limits.

Here more on the story:

Image may contain: one or more people

Categories: Freedom of expression, Islam, Islamophobia, Life in the West

7 replies

  1. Ideas ought to be freely discussed and rejected when and by whom shall choose. That is robust democracy.

    It is illogical to compare a set of ideas ((Islam) to tragic events for comparison. So yes, Muslims often do not allow freedom of speech contra this “scholar” (I.e dhimmi enforcer) when it comes to discussing and rejecting their religious ideas.


  2. Dr Yasir Qadhi is a real scholar, he has numerous degrees and a PhD in Islamic Studies from Harvard University. So he is much better qualified than you, a mere missionary from Down Under.


    • Pathetic- you make a living from and discuss all things biblical without any expertise in the field yourself. You dismiss scholarship regularly and go against almost all New Testament scholarship and you care to complain about this? Talk about hypocrisy!!

      You guys are just all about silencing any and all type of criticism- the evil fruits of Islam


    • well why don’t you just bugger off dear boy. You are no longer welcome on this blog.

      Liked by 1 person

    • You are the pathetic one,

      Unlike lucrative business in the world of harvesting soul in the missionary world, we do not make make a living doing da’wah sorry, we do it for the sake of God. InshaAllah.

      Liked by 2 people

  3. Awww, Lassie is going away? I get a kick out of humiliating the little Gentile mutt.

    As usual, Lassie missed the point. Regardless of whether its an “idea” or a tragic event, the point Dr. Qadhi is making is that every society has its limits and taboos. You can’t make light of 9/11 (nor should you) because free speech has its limits, even in the liberal west. If Charlie Hebdo published a cartoon about 9/11, there is sure to be a furious reaction from Americans.

    Liked by 2 people

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: