Nice!
In a recent CNN interview on Nov 18th, 2016 Kayleigh McEnany, Trump surrogate and political commentator, quoted Andrew Mccarthy (a National Review columnist) as an “Academic” source for her statement “…that 90% of the Quran is a legal document and is Shariah…”
1st: Andy McCarthy is former prosecutor and has no academic study of Islam under his belt.
2nd: The numbers dont lie. Look at these two slides from a recent lecture I gave on Case studies in Islamic law. Out of the 6236 verses of the Quran, less than 9% are about law or legal issues.
When analysing a typical work of Islamic “law”, we can see that 65% of it is not even “law,” instead it is personal custom and devotion.
If we took the 35% of Islamic legal compendiums dealing with contracts, family law, and state power as a derived from the Quran, that would…
View original post 58 more words
Categories: Islam
But that 9% IS about the law and that law is backed by more than 70% of the Muslims in America. That las is NOT compatible with the Constitution, thus their cries for Sharia Law is an attempt at usurping at least and overthrowing at its worst, the federal government and the Constitution. Sharia Law is barbaric, tyrannical and oppressive. If you should like to live under Sharia Law, there are plenty of other countries that would be more compatible with your thought.
LikeLike
Give an example of shariah that is ‘barbaric, tyrannical and oppressive’
LikeLiked by 1 person
Linguisticly there is NO such thing as “Shariah Law”. Maybe take few basic lessons on Islam and Arabic could clear many of your misinformed views.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I recommend you stop watching Fox News or reading any propaganda site. No one (Muslim) wants to do the things you have mentioned. Go out meet Muslims, and see what they have to say instead of hearing things from propagandinists sites…
LikeLike
LOL the UK is a better example of shari`ah than any of the “countries” (sewers) you probably mean. You’d know that if you knew anything about the shari`ah 😂
LikeLike