The Prophet Muhammad, upon whom be peace, was light years ahead of even Abraham Lincoln

Advertisements


Categories: History, Islam, Life in the West

216 replies

    • It’s hard to believe that Voltaire said such things…when i think that i used to admire this guy during my high school days and i loved reading his quotes in my French textbook…

      «C’est une grande question parmi eux s’ils son descendus des singes, ou si les singes sont venus d’eux. Nos sages ont dit que l’homme est l’image de Dieu: voilà une plaisante image de l’Etre éternel qu’un nez noir épaté, avec peu ou point d’intelligence! Un temps viendra, sans doute, où ces animaux sauront bien cultiver la terre, l’embellir par des maisons et par des jardins, et connaître la route des astres. Il faut du temps pour tout»

      He literally calls black people animals without intelligence! You’ll find a lot more on this website…

      http://www.une-autre-histoire.org/voltaire-etait-il-raciste/

      Like

  1. Is this the same Muhammad who kept black slaves(called Anjasha & Mid’am)? Who referred to Ethiopians as ‘raisin heads’? Who considered Arab slaves worth more than African slave? And said Satan looks like a black man?

    Like

    • None of those things are true.

      Like

    • Sounds like you have been reading too much falsehood from Shamoun et. al.

      Meanwhile, the Bible has more than its own share of racist statements, and verses supporting slavery. But I guess that is ok with the likes of you.

      Like

    • Raisin heads? The Prophet never called Ethiopians ‘raisin heads’. ‘Raisin head’ sounds like the expression ‘towel head’ which is an AMERICAN expression. So the Prophet was using an American racist remark against Ethiopians?

      Like

    • Lol, Bad Samaritan is known for making such asinine statements. If you ask him to provide the quote, he will give you a cut and paste version from the likes of Shamoun or Spencer.

      Hey Bad samaritan, why do you worship a Canaanite deity?

      Liked by 1 person

    • Samaritan, show us the quotes…

      Like

    • Shaad,

      Quotes?

      Black slaves:

      Narrated `Umar:
      I came and behold, Allah’s Messenger (ﷺ) was staying on a Mashroba (attic room) and a black slave of Allah’s Messenger (ﷺ) was at the top if its stairs. I said to him, “(Tell the Prophet) that here is `Umar bin Al- Khattab (asking for permission to enter).” Then he admitted me.
      Bukhari 7263
      Book 95, Hadith 17

      Black slave named Anjasha:

      Narrated Anas bin Malik:
      Allah’s Messenger (ﷺ) was on a journey and he had a black slave called Anjasha, and he was driving the camels (very fast, and there were women riding on those camels). Allah’s Messenger (ﷺ) said, “Waihaka (May Allah be merciful to you), O Anjasha! Drive slowly (the camels) with the glass vessels (women)!”

      Like

    • Continued….

      Black slave named Mid’am:

      It was narrated that Abu Hurairah said:

      “We were with the Messenger of Allah in the year of Khaibar, and we did not get any spoils of war except for wealth, goods and clothes. Then a man from Banu Ad-Dubaib, who was called Rifa’ah bin Zaid, gave the Messenger of Allah a black slave who was called Mid’am. The Messenger of Allah set out for Wadi Al-Qura. When we were in Wadi Al-Qura, while Mid’am was unloading the luggage of the Messenger of Allah, an arrow came and killed him. The people said: ‘Congratulations! You will go to Paradise,’ but the Messenger of Allah said: ‘No, by the One in Whose hand is my soul! The cloak that he took from the spoils of war on the Day of Khaibar is burning him with fire.’ When the people heard that, a man brought one or two shoelaces to the Messenger of Allah and the Messenger of Allah said: ‘One or two shoelaces of fire.'”
      Sunan an-Nasa’i Book 35 Hadith 3858

      Muhammad trading 2 black slaves for 1 Arab slave:

      It was narrated that Jabir Sair:

      “A slave came and gave his pledge to the Messenger of Allah to emigrate, and the Prophet did not realize that he was a slave. Then his master came looking for him. The Prophet said; ‘Sell him to me.’ So he bought him for two black slaves, then he did not accept until he had asked; ‘Is he a slave?”’
      Sunan an-Nasa’i Book 44 Hadith 4625

      Muhammad referrring to Ethiopians as ‘Raisin heads’:

      Narrated Anas bin Malik:
      Allah’s Messenger (ﷺ) said, “You should listen to and obey, your ruler even if he was an Ethiopian (black) slave whose head looks like a raisin.”
      Sahib Bukhari 7142

      Narrated Anas:
      The Prophet said, “Listen and obey (your chief) even if an Ethiopian whose head is like a raisin were made your chief.”
      Sahih al-Bukhari Book 11 Hadith 662

      Also in Sahih Muslim Vol 9, pages 46-47 Muhammad calls blacks “pug-nosed slaves”…..Look it up.

      Satan looks like a black man apparently:

      The apostle said, “Whoever wants to see Satan let him take a look at Nabtal b. Al-Hadith!” He was a sturdy black man with long flowing hair, inflamed eyes, and dark ruddy cheeks’
      Ibn Ishaq page 243

      Like

    • Lol Kmak never knew his prophet called Ethiopians ‘raisin heads’.

      Like

  2. Blogging stuff,

    “”None of those things are true””

    I completely agree, but tell that to Muhammad!

    Like

    • @Samaritan

      The Ibn Ishaq quotes aren’t authentic and many of the quotes from the two Sahihs are downright fraudulent since you copy pasted them from Sam Shannon’s answering-islam.com.gov.whathever such as the downright lie “pug-nosed slaves”. I couldn’t continue because of how dishonest one must be to distort things at that level. But you do realize that the Prophet freed all of his “slaves”? Did you know that one of the shares of Zakat are literally “to free slaves” (Q 9:60)? Did you know that freeing slaves was an end goal in itself and the best deeds a Muslim can do and that ‘Umar freed all Arab slaves in the period of his Caliphate? Can we know talk about Christianity?

      Liked by 1 person

    • Whether the hadith from Ishaq is authentic or not is not even of importance. It has nothing to do with racism. The prophet is JUST POINTING OUT the form that the devil took (the prophet didn’t choose it for the devil). In the movies you see the devil in the form of a white man in a suit tempting jesus. Why is that not racist? Cus he’s not black!

      Liked by 1 person

    • “”The Ibn Ishaq quotes aren’t authentic and many of the quotes from the two Sahihs are downright fraudulent since you copy pasted them from Sam Shannon’s answering-islam.com.gov.whathever such as the downright lie “pug-nosed slaves”. I couldn’t continue because of how dishonest one must be to distort things at that level. But you do realize that the Prophet freed all of his “slaves”? Did you know that one of the shares of Zakat are literally “to free slaves” (Q 9:60)? Did you know that freeing slaves was an end goal in itself and the best deeds a Muslim can do and that ‘Umar freed all Arab slaves in the period of his Caliphate? Can we know talk about Christianity?””

      Lol

      Like

    • “”Whether the hadith from Ishaq is authentic or not is not even of importance. It has nothing to do with racism. The prophet is JUST POINTING OUT the form that the devil took (the prophet didn’t choose it for the devil). In the movies you see the devil in the form of a white man in a suit tempting jesus. Why is that not racist? Cus he’s not black!””

      Lol

      Do you expect grown up people to believe that ridiculously desperate bit of apologetics you just typed, Partridge?

      Like

    • Thanks for not refuting anything.

      Liked by 1 person

    • There’s nothing to refute. Your prophet is bang to rights. The evidence is there in black & white. He owned black slaves, referred to Ethiopians as ‘raisin heads’, described blacks as pug-nosed slaves, considered Arab slaves to be worth more than black slaves and claimed Satan looks like a black man.

      I understand you’re upset and disappointed at this discovery but don’t take it out on me. Take it out on your religion’s Hadith collectors for recording these embarrassing quotes and thus exposing your prophet as the certified racist he was.

      Like

    • Bad samaritan, the only one that has been exposed is a moron like you, who uses Google to cut and paste hadiths out of context, as others have already shown.

      One needs only read the Bible to see how your old man of a god taught racism and also practiced it. Gentiles are dogs according to your god.

      You are a laughable loser. By the way, why do you worship a Canaanite god? Still waiting for an answer. 😉

      Liked by 2 people

    • Quranblog,

      Show me how I’ve taken those quotes out of context. Enlighten us.

      Like

    • Sama
      You’re just another Joel that needs bitchslapping and I’ll happily provide in this comment.

      “He owned black slaves, referred to Ethiopians as ‘raisin heads’, described blacks as pug-nosed slaves, considered Arab slaves to be worth more than black slaves and claimed Satan looks like a black man.”

      He owned Arab slaves as well. Does that now make him racist to Arabs and hence to himself? The Jewish prophets had slaves too. Hell even your god took slavegirls in the OT (which according to you is jesus). So if having slaves makes someone unholy then throw your comicbook known as the bible in the garbage bin.
      He told his believers to hold everyone equal even if it is a Ethiopian which looks like raisin. It’s amazing how you turn everything upside down. He is telling his followers to give the same respect to them as everyone else but yet somehow still is racist to blacks which would imply he thinks that they are lower but at the same time he says to listen and obey them. I know your cult teaches you to believe in logical contradictions and use verbal gymnastics to try and justify those concepts like trinity and your god-man concept but don’t throw that crap at our religion. Keep it to yourself please.

      “I understand you’re upset and disappointed at this discovery but don’t take it out on me”

      You think I didn’t know about these hadits? Dear God, Sama you’re pathetic.

      Answer my questions instead of dodging them: if the devil takes on the form of a black man and when the Prophet points that out then does that make him a racist?
      If the Prophet thinks blacks are satanic then why does he honor Bilal, why does he call a black woman ‘a mother after my mother’, why does he criticize one of his companions for treating a black man poorly for being black, why does he say in his last speech: “All mankind is from Adam and Eve. An Arab has no superiority over a non-Arab, nor does a non-Arab have any superiority over an Arab; a WHITE has no superiority over a BLACK, nor does a BLACK have any superiority over a WHITE; [none have superiority over another] EXCEPT by piety and good action. Learn that every Muslim is a brother to every Muslim and that the Muslims constitute one brotherhood. Nothing shall be legitimate to a Muslim which belongs to a fellow Muslim unless it was given freely and willingly. Do not, therefore, do injustice to yourselves.”

      Now do tell us why your all loving god calls all gentiles dogs?

      Like

    • Atlas ,
      Good response, thanks!

      Liked by 1 person

    • can you also explain why god who is creator of all skin , decided to wear jewish feature and colour. what was god doing wearing Jewish features? i mean an atheist could argue that not only did your god choose Israel but he decided to become Israeli and then call a non Jew a little bitch . Why ?

      Like

  3. Lol whenever you associate something with black then it’s racist. So all the devil has to do to mislead people is to use a trick of a 5 year old and take the form of a black man. HE takes the form of a black man, it’s not the prophet who is choosing for satan to take the form of a black man. The prophet is just pointing it out. But apparently that’s racist. So if the devil took on the form of a white man and if the prophet said ‘Hey look there the devil has the form of a white man’ would that be racist too?
    No one would think so, but lowlife people like you are using the current political situation to push your bullshit to make the prophet look like a racist.

    Like

    • Lol

      Dude, do you realise how idiotic you’re being?

      Like

    • Desperate stuff on your part once again, Partridge!

      Like

    • The desperation is only on your side. You’re being a xtian again. It’s the devil who chooses to take on the form of a black man. If someone points out that out then that makes him/her a racist?
      Wtf is this?
      You couldn’t refute anything so you just throw out your usual crosstian bullshit.
      Sad kid! Now get lost.

      Liked by 2 people

  4. Samaritan is just a lowlife that uses current political views to justify his propaganda!

    Liked by 1 person

    • No Partridge no propaganda. I use your own authentic Islamic sources against you. I deal in facts.

      Let’s go through the facts.

      According to sahih hadiths we learn that:

      a) Muhammad owned black slaves
      b) Muhammad traded two black slaves for one Arab slave.
      c) Muhammad referred to Ethiopians as ‘raisin heads’.
      b) Muhammad described black slaves as ‘pug-noses’

      And according one of the earliest biographies of Mo by Ibn Ishaq.

      e) Muhammad claimed Satan looked like a black man.

      Like

    • Sama
      You’re just another Joel that needs bitchslapping and I’ll happily provide in this comment.

      “He owned black slaves, referred to Ethiopians as ‘raisin heads’, described blacks as pug-nosed slaves, considered Arab slaves to be worth more than black slaves and claimed Satan looks like a black man.”

      He owned Arab slaves as well. Does that now make him racist to Arabs and hence to himself? The Jewish prophets had slaves too. Hell even your god took slavegirls in the OT (which according to you is jesus). So if having slaves makes someone unholy then throw your comicbook known as the bible in the garbage bin.
      He told his believers to hold everyone equal even if it is a Ethiopian which looks like raisin. It’s amazing how you turn everything upside down. He is telling his followers to give the same respect to them as everyone else but yet somehow still is racist to blacks which would imply he thinks that they are lower but at the same time he says to listen and obey them. I know your cult teaches you to believe in logical contradictions and use verbal gymnastics to try and justify those concepts like trinity and your god-man concept but don’t throw that crap at our religion. Keep it to yourself please.

      “I understand you’re upset and disappointed at this discovery but don’t take it out on me”

      You think I didn’t know about these hadits? Dear God, Sama you’re pathetic.

      Answer my questions instead of dodging them: if the devil takes on the form of a black man and when the Prophet points that out then does that make him a racist?
      If the Prophet thinks blacks are satanic then why does he honor Bilal, why does he call a black woman ‘a mother after my mother’, why does he criticize one of his companions for treating a black man poorly for being black, why does he say in his last speech: “All mankind is from Adam and Eve. An Arab has no superiority over a non-Arab, nor does a non-Arab have any superiority over an Arab; a WHITE has no superiority over a BLACK, nor does a BLACK have any superiority over a WHITE; [none have superiority over another] EXCEPT by piety and good action. Learn that every Muslim is a brother to every Muslim and that the Muslims constitute one brotherhood. Nothing shall be legitimate to a Muslim which belongs to a fellow Muslim unless it was given freely and willingly. Do not, therefore, do injustice to yourselves.”

      Now do tell us why your all loving god calls all gentiles dogs?

      Like

    • “No Partridge no propaganda. I use your own authentic Islamic sources against you. I deal in facts.”

      No you deal bullshit. You use the ‘black racist’ card to justify your position. If something refers to black that you don’t like then you play the racist card. Answer my questions.
      Btw your bible calls the descendants of Ishmael wild men. Isn’t that racist towards Arabs who you think are racists? O sorry I forgot, they’re not black! Just brown! But these days we can shit on brown people from the skies and that’s totally ok. Hale fucking lujah!

      Liked by 1 person

    • Partridge,

      It gets worse.
      Did you know Muhammad renamed one of his black slaves ‘Safina’ which means ship?

      The story goes…

      Mahran was renamed (by Muhammad) Safina (i.e. ship). He himself relates his own story. He says, “The apostle of God and his companions went on a trip. When their belongings became too heavy for them to carry, Muhammad told me, ‘Spread your garment.’ They filled it with their belongings, then they put it on me. The apostle of God told me, ‘Carry it for you are a ship.’ Even if I was carrying a load of six or seven donkeys while we were on a journey, anyone who felt weak would throw his clothes or his shield or his sword on me so I would carry that, a heavy load. The prophet told me, ‘You are a ship’”
      (Ibn Qayyim, pp. 115–116, al Hulya, vol. l, p. 369, quoted from Amad 5:222).

      Like

    • c) Muhammad referred to Ethiopians as ‘raisin heads’.

      what, would you prefer “shit heads” instead?

      raisin is a fruit.

      Like

    • So going by mr heathcliff’s desperately imbecilic logic calling a person with a large round head ‘Melon head’ is a compliment, ladies n gentleman lol

      Like

    • Still no answer from sama.
      O dear o dear! Desperation is choking hard right now.
      O and btw that renaming of the slave: he actually didn’t mind it. In fact he preferred his new name rather then his real name.
      Answer my questions now loser.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Atlas Partridge

      I deleted your comment as it was gratuitously offensive

      Like

    • Fair enough. But if calling someone ‘fatty’ or ‘crossdressing’ is too much then is calling our beloved prophet ‘pedophile’ not worse? Haven’t really seen those comments being removed.

      Liked by 2 people

    • Hey dummy, the renaming is not the real issue.

      This bit is:

      “”Even if I was carrying a load of six or seven donkeys while we were on a journey, anyone who felt weak would throw his clothes or his shield or his sword on me so I would carry that, a heavy load. “”

      Use your head. Stop making ridiculous excuses for the inexcusable.

      Next you’ll come back and say Safina enjoyed being a human ship for Muhammad and his lazy companions.

      Like

    • i will try to be more consistent. In the meantime try not to be abusive of people who might read these comments

      Liked by 1 person

    • belieber

      “You’re just another Joel that needs bitchslapping and I’ll happily provide in this comment.

      LOL!! Keep hallucinating.

      “He owned Arab slaves as well. Does that now make him racist to Arabs and hence to himself?”

      How does owning slaves make someone a non-racist? You are such a moron.

      Please, explain your stupid reasoning – mohammed owned arab slaves, therefore he was not racist towards lack people. LOL!! Really?

      Owning slaves makes him an exploiter and a really bad example. Idiot.

      Like

    • Mr Partridge,

      Seeing as you’re in denial over Muhammad’s blatant racism. Why am I not surprised that you’re now defending pedophilia?

      In what way is somebody who is on record of sleeping with a 9 year old not a pedophile?

      Like

    • LOL, Coco is pissed off at Atlas! Brother, he doesn’t like it when you talk about his embarrassments!

      Coco, the dancing monkey, your god never told his disciples that slavery was bad. And your false apostle Paul told slaves to obey their masters. That would make both of them very bad examples to follow!

      In contrast, the blessed Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) encouraged the freeing of slaves! He was light years ahead of your false god!

      Liked by 1 person

    • “How does owning slaves make someone a non-racist? You are such a moron.

      Please, explain your stupid reasoning – mohammed owned arab slaves, therefore he was not racist towards lack people. LOL!! Really?

      Owning slaves makes him an exploiter and a really bad example. Idiot.”

      O it’s you again.
      Well let’s continue your education shall we.
      Your buddy sama says that Muhammad (saw) owned black slaves. By this he implies that the Prophet was racist towards black people. So if something is done to someone of a particular race and that makes him/her a racist towards that race then I just use the same logic by asking why doesn’t that implication work when we know that the Prophet owned Arab slaves too? Was he a racist towards Arabs now too and hence to himself? Obviously this is ridiculous. So the whole ‘having black slaves makes him racist towards black’ argument FAILS.
      But you see now the topic all of a sudden changes! Now it’s not about blacks anymore, now it’s just about having slaves in general. And that’s where also you come in, my boy!
      “Owning slaves makes him an exploiter and a really bad example”
      Then please throw your bible in the garbage bin cus Jewish prophets had slaves. Why on earth do I have to explain BASIC stuff to allegedly grown up people???
      Your god, your amaaaaazzzzzinng god (who you think is jesus) says that you can beat a slave woman and if she gets up after a day or two then there is no punishment for you.
      Your prince of peace even got slaves in the OT. I think it was 32!
      Noah had hundreds! Abraham had them. Etc etc etc!
      So all of these Godly people are exploiters and really bad examples, including Jesus!

      Liked by 2 people

    • qb

      LOL!!

      Moron – mohammed’s shoddy humanity doesn’t make me angry. It makes me sad for all you stupid idiots that think he is a good example.

      Can you explain which part of owning another human being is worthy of imitation?

      Like

    • belieber

      “So if something is done to someone of a particular race and that makes him/her a racist towards that race then I just use the same logic by asking why doesn’t that implication work when we know that the Prophet owned Arab slaves too? Was he a racist towards Arabs now too and hence to himself? Obviously this is ridiculous.”

      With this one passage you expose the full depths of your stupidity.

      FIrstly, stupid, owning arab slaves does not mean that mohammed was not racist towards blacks – it is such a simple line of reasoning, but you just don’t grasp it. And yes, mohammed could be racist towards other arabs even if he was an arab himself, so your moronic thinking fails on that level too. There are plenty of examples of people who hate their own race.

      Also, samaritan quote mohammed’s statements where he insulted the racial characteristics of Africans – this makes him racist as clear as day to anyone who isn’t stupid and brainwashed by islam.

      LOL!! You are an idiot.

      Like

    • qb

      “Coco got neutered! Ouch!!”

      LOL!! NO I didn’t. That blood is the menstruation fluid your prophet recited the quran over. LOL!!

      Poor qb you’re reduced to sniffing out the sloppy seconds of moronic comments by that other idiot belieber. LOL!!

      Like

    • “With this one passage you expose the full depths of your stupidity.

      FIrstly, stupid, owning arab slaves does not mean that mohammed was not racist towards blacks – it is such a simple line of reasoning, but you just don’t grasp it. And yes, mohammed could be racist towards other arabs even if he was an arab himself, so your moronic thinking fails on that level too. There are plenty of examples of people who hate their own race.

      Also, samaritan quote mohammed’s statements where he insulted the racial characteristics of Africans – this makes him racist as clear as day to anyone who isn’t stupid and brainwashed by islam.”

      Good Lord!
      Wooow! The fact you still think you are making valid points is mind blowing!
      Sama says that Muhammad (saw) had black slaves and hence is racist to blacks.
      This argument FAILS if you consider the fact that he had Arab slaves. Then you try and be desperate by saying that ‘welllllll maaaybbee he was racist towards Arabs too’. Wow! Just wow! The level of desperation! Ok! Show me he is racist towards his own people.
      I can show you that he is the opposite towards not just his own people but towards blacks as well.
      “All mankind is from Adam and Eve. An ARAB has no superiority over a NON-ARAB, nor does aNON-ARAB have any superiority over an ARAB; a WHITE has no superiority over a BLACK, nor does a BLACK have any superiority over a WHITE; [none have superiority over another] EXCEPT by piety and good action. Learn that every Muslim is a brother to every Muslim and that the Muslims constitute one brotherhood. Nothing shall be legitimate to a Muslim which belongs to a fellow Muslim unless it was given freely and willingly. Do not, therefore, do injustice to yourselves.”

      We were talking about the first ‘argument’: having black slaves makes you racist towards black. Now you jump to other things you buddy sama said.
      If the Prophet is racist towards blacks because he uses the words ‘raisin heads’ then that means he considers them to be lower in class then others but how on earth does that work when in the same sentence he tells his followers to listen and obey them? Xtians love self contradictions. Your entire pagan religion is built on it. But ours is NOT. So keep that garbage to yourself.

      Like

    • LOL, Coco sounds like a pissed off teenager! “No, I didn’t get neutered! You’re an idiot!” Bwahahaha!

      You ran away from the menstruation discussion after you got whooped! Now you’re bringing it back? Maybe you can answer my question which every Christian here was afraid to answer:

      Can a Christian husband have sex with his wife when she is menstruating?”

      Liked by 1 person

    • “Also, samaritan quote mohammed’s statements where he insulted the racial characteristics of Africans – this makes him racist as clear as day to anyone who isn’t stupid and brainwashed by islam.”

      your god jeebus the pagan triplet goat piggy god is the one who is racist. he chose SKIN colour of jewish people . he told his pals to avoid non-jews like the plague .

      quote :
      Listen and obey (your chief) even if an Ethiopian whose head is like a raisin were made your chief

      it does not say ALL africans have head or hair style like raisin .

      here it is a DESCRIPTION of their HEAD not their colour.

      if i am describing something and i know that my RACE IS NOT SUPERIOR to ANOTHERS race, then there is no WAY i can be RACIST.

      Liked by 1 person

    • “”Then you try and be desperate by saying that ‘welllllll maaaybbee he was racist towards Arabs too’”

      christian anti semiticism came about after jezer called the jews off spring of satan.

      who knows , maybe it was possible for jeezer to be racist towards the jews and the non-jews?

      gentiles he calls dogs/pigs
      and jews he says are the OFF SpRING of satan .

      Like

    • Joel,

      If we go by Alan Partridge’s rationale, it would be wrong to call any of the Atlantic slave traders racist lol.

      Just because they transported thousounds of Africans to America and treated them in all kinds of inhumane manners, doesn’t mean they were racist!!!

      Just because you call someone a raisin head or melon head, it can’t be derogatory. I mean we’re talking about fruit and fruit is tastet right? Take it as a compliment blackies!!

      This is the level of apologetics we’re dealing with here with these Muslims.

      Like

    • Tasty not tastet.

      Like

    • Not ONE questions that I posed was answered by sama!
      Sad panda.

      Now tell us why your pagan god calls gentiles dogs?
      Comparing us all to butt sniffers is something truly beautiful. Hallelujaaaaaaaaahhhh!!

      Like

    • “If we go by Alan Partridge’s rationale, it would be wrong to call any of the Atlantic slave traders racist lol.”

      Did those slavetraders say that blacks are not superior to non-blacks and vice versa? Did they call those black slave women ‘mother after my mother’ did they critisice their own people for treating black people bad just for being black? Did they say of themselves they were not better then other nations and vice versa?
      Did they follow their bible filled with verses of treating slaves like excrement? Yes they did.

      Like

    • samaritan

      Agreed!

      It gets worse for our brainwashed muslim friends.

      Mohammed was an equal opportunity racist…

      Narrated Abu Huraira:

      Allah’s Apostle said, “The Hour will not be established until you fight with the Jews, and the stone behind which a Jew will be hiding will say. “O Muslim! There is a Jew hiding behind me, so kill him.”

      Bukhari Volume 4, book 52, verse 177

      and…

      Narrated Abu Huraira: Allah’s Apostle said, “The Hour will not be established until you fight with the Turks; people with small eyes, red faces, and flat noses. Their faces will look like shields coated with leather. The Hour will not be established till you fight with people whose shoes are made of hair.”

      Vol 4, book 52, verse 179

      Blaks, Asiatic turks and jews….is there anyone else left to racially abuse?

      Like

    • LOL, Coco the dancing monkey tried to help his fellow idiot out and made things worse!

      So now everything is “racist”? Even predicting that there will be a war between Muslims and some other group makes it “racist”?

      Remind me again…what people will comprise the army of Gog and Magog according to Revelation? Nations from the “four corners” of the earth? Hmm, so basically, all people in the earth will oppose your god and be wiped out, right? I guess that makes your god a SUPER-RACIST! HAHAHAHA!!!

      Liked by 2 people

    • belieber

      “Sama says that Muhammad (saw) had black slaves and hence is racist to blacks.
      This argument FAILS if you consider the fact that he had Arab slaves. Then you try and be desperate by saying that ‘welllllll maaaybbee he was racist towards Arabs too’. “

      You just can’t get any more stupid.

      Your reasoning is faulty – don’t you get it? Mohammed was racist towards blacks because he mocked their racial characteristics and he subjugated them through enslavement. Having Arab slaves as well doesn’t change these facts about his prejudice towards blacks.

      Let’s put it this way, moron. It is historical fact that a white man in 17th century West Indies might have had black slaves whom he thinks are subhuman, he might also have had white slaves whom he thinks are not subhuman but are beneath him – does that make him not racist towards the blacks? Take your time with this one because this is your argument you imbecile.

      I am actually starting to feel really sorry for you – it might nit be your fault tat you are such a stupid moron.

      LOL!!!

      Do you get it now, idiot?

      And, no, I haven’t said that maybe mohammed was a racist towards arabs, you poo brain. I said that your presumption that he could not be racist towards arabs because he was an arab is ignorant, stupid, and extremely bad reasoning. It can’t be explained to you if you can’t grasp the such simple logic as this.

      Like

    • qb

      You stupid tampax, calm down or you’ll give the two brain cells in your anus a hemorrhoid.

      Can a Christian husband have sex with his wife when she is menstruating?”

      Why do you want to know the intimate details of other men’s sex lives you pervert? Humans are animals, your holey book is supposed to be sacred but your prophet recited it whilst touching his menstruating wife – against the explicit commands of the quran.

      HE DISOBEYED HIS GOAT.

      Don’t get upset with me menstruation boy, blame the man whose enslavement of other human beings was considered a great example by your goat god and his molester angels.

      Like

    • qb

      “Even predicting that there will be a war between Muslims and some other group makes it “racist”?”

      Don’t get angry, menstruation boy, it’s all in your holey scriptures you imbecile.

      And as for this “prediction” it’s more of a self-fulfilling prophecy. Mohammed was hateful towards the jews, and as shown by this racist hadith, he fostered hatred towards them amongst his followers. No surprise, then that there would be enmity between jews and muslims.

      LOL!! You are so gullible you idiot.

      Your prophet mocked the racial characteristics of blacks, and asiatic turks, and preached genocide of the jews.

      Can you explain what is the good example from all of this?

      Like

    • “You just can’t get any more stupid.

      Your reasoning is faulty – don’t you get it? Mohammed was racist towards blacks because he mocked their racial characteristics and he subjugated them through enslavement. Having Arab slaves as well doesn’t change these facts about his prejudice towards blacks.

      Let’s put it this way, moron. It is historical fact that a white man in 17th century West Indies might have had black slaves whom he thinks are subhuman, he might also have had white slaves whom he thinks are not subhuman but are beneath him – does that make him not racist towards the blacks? Take your time with this one because this is your argument you imbecile.

      I am actually starting to feel really sorry for you – it might nit be your fault tat you are such a stupid moron.

      LOL!!!

      Do you get it now, idiot?

      And, no, I haven’t said that maybe mohammed was a racist towards arabs, you poo brain. I said that your presumption that he could not be racist towards arabs because he was an arab is ignorant, stupid, and extremely bad reasoning. It can’t be explained to you if you can’t grasp the such simple logic as this.”

      “Mohammed was racist towards blacks because he mocked their racial characteristics and he subjugated them through enslavement.”
      Firstly having black slaves does NOT make you racist towards blacks. If that’s true then that implies for all the other races that you have slaves of. You’re only a racist if you treat that race as less than yours you fucking trash!
      The Prophet explicitly said that Arabs are not superior to non-Arabs and vice versa and that Whites are not superior to blacks and vice versa.
      This is an explicit statement. You can pretend he didn’t say this as much as you want and still push your bullshit down everyone’s throat but non-xtians like to use a think called logic which is incompatible with crosstianity. Don’t compare your white man bullshit with the Islamic treatment of slaves. Your bible treats slaves as excrement.

      ” I said that your presumption that he could not be racist towards arabs because he was an arab is ignorant, stupid, and extremely bad reasoning. It can’t be explained to you if you can’t grasp the such simple logic as this”
      You fucking trash, I gave you the hadith where he said EXPLICITLY that he considers and ARAB not superior to a NON-ARAB and vice versa. You’re so fucking moronic!

      No do what your loser in faith Sama couldn’t do. Answer this question:
      Why does your pagan mangod call gentiles dogs? Yaaay the prince of peace calls us all buttsniffers. Lucky us!

      Liked by 1 person

    • “No surprise, then that there would be enmity between jews and muslims.”
      To bad in everything you say there are facts that bitchslap you and your arguments.
      If the jews were treated so poorly by Muslims then why the fuck did they emigrate to Muslim lands from crosstian European lands?

      Like

    • LOL, Coco the dancing monkey does what he does best…dancing around a question!

      Calm down, you neutered monkey. I know being neutered isn’t fun, but get what you ask for.

      So you didn’t answer my question, as usual. No problem! I’ll just keep asking to emphasize the point that you idiots are so afraid! Can Christian husbands have sex with their menstruating wives?

      LOL, you don’t seem to have a problem discussing the Prophet Muhammad’s personal life, you sick lowlife! Can anyone define “irony”? Hahahaha!

      I whooped you on this matter already. It’s no wonder you ran off. All you can do is repeat the same nonsense. That’s expected, of course. All you have to rely on is your one lone brain cell and your lying spirit sent by your Canaanite god. 😉

      Liked by 2 people

    • Coco, what an idiot you are! The Prophet simply described the physical traits of the Turks! How else would he have described them? And this was not a “self-fulfilling” prophecy. It happened hundreds of years later, and there is no way he could have known it would happen if he did not have supernatural knowledge. In contrast, your pathetic Bible makes dozens of false prophecies! Your Canaanite god even says that the whole world will attack Jerusalem and be destroyed. You’re fake god who came out of a woman’s body is a SUPER-RACIST!

      Like

    • Joel
      Why do you want to know the intimate details of other men’s sex lives you pervert? Humans are animals, your holey book is supposed to be sacred but your prophet recited it whilst touching his menstruating wife – against the explicit commands of the quran.

      I say;
      The above is said by someone whose God is animal. Joel, did you forget your God is man/animal? Menses is the unclean part not the woman herself. Our prophet did not sprinkle the menses blood on our Holy Book.

      Wont you kiss your wife who is menstruating? Wont you touch your wife who is menstruating? Wont you reading Bible to your wife who is menstruating? It is ignorant people like you who classified menstruating women as evil and God will punish you for that.

      Your God came from the menses of a woman. Do you not know that?

      Thanks.

      Liked by 2 people

    • Brother joel is just a pathetic little loser.
      The prophet said that not approaching your wives during menstruation mean not have sex with them. The sad thing is that crosstians know this. They’ll whine and cry when you do something like that to their holey comicbook but they do it to the Quran all the time even though the Prophet himself said what the meaning of that verse was.
      Saheeh Muslim

      Book 003, Number 0592:

      “Thabit narrated it from Anas: Among the Jews, when a woman menstruated, they did not dine with her, nor did they live with them in their houses; so the Companions of the Apostle (may peace be upon him) asked The Apostle (may peace be upon him), and Allah, the Exalted revealed:” And they ask you about menstruation; say it is a pollution, so keep away from woman during menstruation” to the end (Qur’an, ii. 222). The Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) said: DO EVERYTHING EXCEPT INTERCOURSE. The Jews heard of that and said: This man does not want to leave anything we do without opposing us in it. Usaid b. Hudair and Abbad b. Bishr came and said: Messenger of Allah, the Jews say such and such thing. We should not have, therefore, any contactwith them (as the Jews do). The face of the Messenger of Allah (way peace be upon him) underwent such a change that we thought he was angry with them, but when they went out, they happened to receive a gift of milk which was sent to the Apostle of Allah (may peace be upon him). He (the Holy Prophet) called for them and gave them drink, whereby they knew that he was not angry with them.”
      So the prophet immediately after the revelation of that verse said that it means that you can do everything except intercourse. Nothing about not touching them.

      When it suits them they’ll say we have to go to Muhammad to see what he understood by what the Quran said cus he is the one that brought the Quran and when it doesn’t work out for them they’ll do the exact opposite.

      Their pagan god spend 9 months in a womb and came out of a vagina with blood and goo all over him.
      Unbelievable that these very same people who believe this bullshit have the audacity to talk about the Prophet and deliberately just LIE AND LIE to hide the shit in their religion.

      Like

    • torah says that joel is making spiritual homosexuality with his god who leaves tombs half naked. torah clearly says that IDOLATRY IS ADULTERY and joel is a homosexual who likes to grab naked men who leave linen clothing. ergo joel is a christian homosexual when he is always thinking about loving a naked man and eating his flesh and drinking his blood etc etc

      joel is doing spiritual homosexuality with jeesus.

      this is 100 % CORRECT because torah sees worship of man as doing ADULTERY .

      Like

    • belieber

      Don’t get mad, dog. We just discussing.

      You are an idiot and the light bulb has just clicked in your single digit brain celled mind that you reasoning is stupid beyond belief. I’d be embarrassed too. Clearly, now you understand that it is really stupid of you to have claimed that mohammed keeping arab slaves equates to him not being racist towards blacks.

      You are so dumb, dude.

      Now, the sad part is, your prophet was clearly racist towards jews, asiatic turks, and blacks.

      “Why does your pagan mangod call gentiles dogs?”

      Jesus does not call gentiles dogs.

      Like

    • belieber

      “The prophet said that not approaching your wives during menstruation mean not have sex with them. “

      Idiot. Why do we need narrations written by men to explain your holey book when it is supposed to be complete?

      It’s all unraveling now. Allah’s holey book is reliant on human works to give it context and meaning. You are a gullible fool.

      Like

    • “Why does your pagan mangod call gentiles dogs?”

      quote :
      Jesus does not call gentiles dogs.

      your homosexuality has completely corrupted your brain ?

      a woman begs for her daughter to get healed . she repeatedly begs jesus and his disciples to which his disciples say ” help her ”

      jesus replies : i have not come but to the lost sheep who will get me beaten the crap out of by roman pagans , i don’t know why i chose to become a jew, i wish i didn’t KILL those amalekites, maybe if i sent my revelations to them, they wouldn’t have been such arse holes like my children.

      when jesus ADDRESSES her, he tells her that her SICK ILL DAUGHTER IS A LITTLE DOG

      “let the CHILDREN FIRST BE FED , since it is not right to take the CHILDREN’S BREAD AND CAST IT TO DOGS (obviously HER SICK DAUGHTER )

      jesus is WORSE scum here because he didn’t give a damn about an ILL child .

      while she is BEGGING, she gets to HEAR her daughter called a LITTLE shit eating dog.

      ONLY after she agrees to being the BITCH of jesus and SLAVE of children does she change jesus’ MIND .

      yes, your wife is BITCH of jesus and SLAVE OF THE jews.

      Like

    • qb

      Tampax, what are you even talking about? Your prophet put himself out there as an example to the rest of humanity and imbeciles like you are trying to inflict that example on everyone.

      You are a pervert because you demand to know the intimate details of other men’s sex lives who don’t claim to be great examples. Sure;y you are not that stupid that you see equivalence here? Idiot.

      And what is this about me having one brain cell? You are so stupid that you can’t even come up with original insults.

      Wow, just wow……your entire religion is exact;y the same……..a mish mash of other plagiarized religious beliefs, none of which are original to allah.

      Like

    • “Jesus does not call gentiles dogs.”

      LOL, oh Coco, you lying loser! Don’t lie about your god. It’s there is Mark and Matthew. The Gentile Luke didn’t like the story so he kept it hidden from his Gentile readers. Can’t blame him. No one wants to find out that their supposed god is a RACIST!

      Like

    • qb

      Menstruation boy.

      “Coco, what an idiot you are! The Prophet simply described the physical traits of the Turks! How else would he have described them? And this was not a “self-fulfilling” prophecy. “

      What. A. Complete. Moron.

      The self-fulfilling prophecy is about the jews you imbecile – can’t you even read?

      Like

    • qb

      Hey, low IQ genius tampax boy.

      “LOL, oh Coco, you lying loser! Don’t lie about your god. It’s there is Mark and Matthew. The Gentile Luke didn’t like the story so he kept it hidden from his Gentile readers. Can’t blame him. No one wants to find out that their supposed god is a RACIST!”

      LOL!!

      You are not making sense again menstrual fluid boy. Why don’t you go ahead and explain exactly what you mean?

      Don’t be scared, you’ve already been exposed as a complete imbecile a hundred times over. LOL!!

      Like

    • ROTFL, come now Coco! Quit dancing you loser!

      My question is not about being an example, you idiot! Nor am I asking about a particular person’s sex life. I am asking if Christians are allowed to have intercourse with a menstruating woman. It’s a simple question about what your religion allows. I know you are afraid to answer it. It’s okay, little monkey. Just answer the question.

      Liked by 1 person

    • joel . i still don’t get why aren’t you defending your bible at barry jones’ blog

      https://turchisrong.blogspot.co.uk/2017/10/frank-tureks-dishonesty-concerning.html

      you didn’t provide any responses to jones EVEN THOUGH he has a COMMENT SECTION. are you scared joel ?

      Liked by 1 person

    • qb

      Don’t get upset tampax residue boy. You are being a pervert and you know it. Your prophet was a racist who recited the quran in close proximity to menstrual fluid. Not my fault. handle it, moron.

      Anything to defend your silly religion. You’d even resort to sexual perversion. LOL!!!

      Like

    • “Anything to defend your silly religion. You’d even resort to sexual perversion. LOL!!!”

      look at all the shit jesus done in the ot joel

      https://turchisrong.blogspot.co.uk/2017/10/frank-tureks-dishonesty-concerning.html

      you will resort to anything to lick your naked man god, wouldn’t you ? hey joel, what do you imagine when you eat jesus? any homosexual thoughts? do you like eating jesus joel?

      Like

    • Haha joel keep repeating yourself loser.

      The following hadith which I gave you a million times refutes your SHIT:
      Book 003, Number 0592:

      “Thabit narrated it from Anas: Among the Jews, when a woman menstruated, they did not dine with her, nor did they live with them in their houses; so the Companions of the Apostle (may peace be upon him) asked The Apostle (may peace be upon him), and Allah, the Exalted revealed:” And they ask you about menstruation; say it is a pollution, so keep away from woman during menstruation” to the end (Qur’an, ii. 222). The Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) said: DO EVERYTHING EXCEPT INTERCOURSE. The Jews heard of that and said: This man does not want to leave anything we do without opposing us in it. Usaid b. Hudair and Abbad b. Bishr came and said: Messenger of Allah, the Jews say such and such thing. We should not have, therefore, any contactwith them (as the Jews do). The face of the Messenger of Allah (way peace be upon him) underwent such a change that we thought he was angry with them, but when they went out, they happened to receive a gift of milk which was sent to the Apostle of Allah (may peace be upon him). He (the Holy Prophet) called for them and gave them drink, whereby they knew that he was not angry with them.”
      So the prophet immediately after the revelation of that verse said that it means that you can do everything except intercourse. Nothing about not touching them.

      EVERYONE knows that reading scripture near a menstruation woman is not something that’s wrong.
      Hell even your holy ghost is in believing crosstians. He doesn’t not only mind the menstruation, but he doesn’t mind the urine/excrement either. Your pagan mangod literally came out of a woman’s private part!

      WHO on earth is sooooooooooooooooo idiot to then turn around and make statement about the Prophet while everyone know what the prophet meant by Q 2:222. I mean ffs we even have a clear hadith about this.
      You racist mangod who call gentiles dogs and comes out of a woman’s private part with blood and goo all over him is SOOOOO holy. O dear joelly please baptize me in the name of your three unitarian gods who according to your logic are equal to goats.

      Like

    • “Don’t get upset tampax residue boy. You are being a pervert and you know it. Your prophet was a racist who recited the quran in close proximity to menstrual fluid. Not my fault. handle it, moron.

      Anything to defend your silly religion. You’d even resort to sexual perversion. LOL!!!”

      LOL, the moron is so scared that he will not answer the question about whether his religion allows a husband to have intercourse his wife while she is menstruating! Don’t you think that Christians should know whether this is allowed or not? Stop trying to distract by making laughable and childish accusations, idiot!

      Once again:

      Can a Christian husband have intercourse with his wife while she is menstruating?”

      Ask your Canaanite god to help you answer the question. Try this prayer:

      “Oh, old man sitting on his throne. Oh, Ancient of Days, who is no different from El or Odin. Hear my prayer. This Muslim is asking me a tough question. I keep trying to stall by saying he is a pervert but I know it is a valid question. I don’t know how to answer him. Please, my Canaanite god, show your monkey servant how to answer his question. Oh old man with white hair, you are the highest god. You know all (or is it most) things. Can a Christian husband have sex with his wife while she is menstruating?”

      Let me know if you get an answer, Coco!

      Like

    • LOL, Coco seems to have an unhealthy fixation on women’s tampons! Talk about a pervert!

      “The self-fulfilling prophecy is about the jews you imbecile – can’t you even read?”

      LOL, so you acknowledge that the prophecy about the Turks came true? Thank you for admitting the truth of Islam! LOL, what an idiot! I understand why you might be impressed. After all, your pathetic Bible makes SO MANY false prophecies that you Christians don’t know what a true prophecy look like!

      The prophecy about the Jews also cannot be a “self-fulfilling” prophecy idiot. How can it be if it’s about the end times? Also, if the Prophet wanted to start a war with the Jews, then why did he allow them to live in Arabia? Why did he conduct business transactions with them?

      You are a moron. Your Canaanite god has corrupted your mind beyond repair.

      “You are not making sense again menstrual fluid boy. Why don’t you go ahead and explain exactly what you mean?

      Don’t be scared, you’ve already been exposed as a complete imbecile a hundred times over. LOL!!”

      LOL!!! Are you really playing this game, little Coco? Are you born this dense or did it take some practice?

      Surely you know about the Syrophoenician woman who came to Jesus? You know his response, right? This story is found in Mark and Matthew but not in Luke. Go ahead, try to find it in Luke’s gospel. Why do you think a Gentile like Luke removed that story? Come now, little chimp. Try to answer. Don’t be scared. You’ve already been exposed as a complete simian imbecile a hundred times over. Ask your old man from Canaan for help. LOL!!!

      Like

    • belieber

      LOL!! YOU MORON. YOU POSTED THE SAME COMMENT IN TWO POSTS!!

      “The Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) said: DO EVERYTHING EXCEPT INTERCOURSE”

      LOL!! You moron.

      You are just too dumb and brainwashed to comprehend the ramifications of your argument. You fool!!

      Your goaty god clearly says in his plagiarized holey book that men are to STAY AWAY FROM THEIR WIVES during menstruation.

      You prophet on the other hand commands his followers to contradict this direct and clear command. OMG, you are so, so, stupid!!

      Even worse, your prophet says – according to you – that muslims can “DO EVERYTHING EXCEPT INTERCOURSE”. Does that mean he permitted oral sex on menstruating wives? Fondling? Or both in addition to reciting the quran at the same time?

      Your prophet DISOBEYED the clear word of your god’s book and led his followers to do the same. You just cannot get more stupid than you.

      I’ll spell it out for you imbecile…..your goat says “STAY AWAY”, your prophet says “DON’T STAY AWAY”.

      Muslims revere the words of a human being who disrespected the word of his god by reciting with smelling distance of menstrual blood – you definitely do not submit to allah in this case.lOL!!

      Like

    • qb

      You pervert, you just can’t stop prying into the sex lives of strangers! LOL!!

      Jesus taught us to love others as we love ourselves – menstruation is painful for women, so no causing pain for our own gratification contravenes the greatest commandment, imbecile.

      Anyways, your prophet was a racist who despised blacks, asiatic turks and jews. He drank camel’s piss and was turned on by a six-year old. No wonder you are obsessed with other men”s sex lives.

      You are a tampax.

      Like

  5. Samaritan, not only did your god choose the Jewish race, but as a Jew, he called a non Jew animal . Dogs eat their own shit. Your god was disgustingly racist.

    Liked by 2 people

    • Not only he/she quotes Ibn Ishaq, he/she mistakes a trade between a buyer and a seller as

      Like

    • Not only he/she quotes Ibn Ishaq, he/she mistakes a trade between a buyer and a seller as being racist by ignoring the context of an agreement…

      Liked by 1 person

    • On top of that i learned that having black slaves makes you a racist…

      Like

    • Shaad,

      Lol you’re another Muslim who wasn’t even aware of these Hadiths aren’t you?

      Like

    • I wasn’t aware of the ibn ishaq one…

      Liked by 1 person

    • Which apparently was very nonsensical of you to quote it due to the fact that Ibn Ishaq is an unreliable source and on top of that the hadith that you quoted isn’t even listed in “As-Saheeh Al-Musnad min Asbaab An-Nuzool”….i want to attack Islam, you should probably learn some hadith science first so as to stop looking like a fool

      Like

    • I meant “if you want to attack islam” instead of “i want to attack islam”…a mistake

      Like

    • Shaad,

      Well,to be fair, neither was bad samaritan. He just copied it off the Internet. These idiots love to appeal to Ibn Ishaq, but they don’t realize that Muslims do not consider his Sirah to be completely reliable. So, it makes no difference to us because it is not an authoritative source. It just makes them look foolish and ignorant…which of they are! LOL!

      Liked by 3 people

    • Quran&bible, let them do it, we should be more than happy to expose their willful ignorance…

      Like

    • Quranblog,

      Still waiting for your expert exegesis on those hadiths I supposedly quoted out of context.

      Like

    • Based on the criterion of embarrassment and dating, the sira narrative of ibn ishaq is more likely to be true.

      Sadly, Muslims won’t accept common standards of history.

      Worse still, their rejection of stories more likely to be true leads one to ask why Muslims were fabricating stories in the first place. We all know that hundreds of thousands of Hadith were fabricated.

      And still worse, Muslims reject this because of isnaad which is a circular and self refuting criterion.

      I honestly don’t know why people remain Muslim. The societal and family pressure must be so strong that these poor guys have no choice but to attempt to rationalise the irrational

      Like

    • The Criteria of embarrassment can help establish jeezer was a fraud. For example, he probably really was unable to do MIRACLES and fristians created the BULLSHIT “because people lacked faith”
      Face the facts, criteria of embarrassment is uncovering a fact that jeezer was a false prophet and MAYBE THERE IS EVEN MORE EMBARRASING PART TO THE STORY which was not narrated.

      HOW is criteria of embarrassment HELPFUL WHEN

      1. Narrators are UNKNOWN
      2.unknown could be NON MUSLIMS
      3. They could be hypocrites
      4.liars

      Liked by 1 person

    • Paula’s I tell you the truth, you are a hypocrite. Applying the criteria on jeezer could completely fuck up your beliefs , not saying that your beliefs aren’t already fucked

      Like

    • ROTFL, so now Cerbie is an expert historian? Oh man, the comedy never ends with these clowns!

      Cerbie, you poor ignorant Gentile dog, historians have recognized the historical validity of using an isnaad, and that is precisely why Ibn Ishaq’s work is not accepted blindly. Scholars like Harald Motzki have discussed this issue at length and have come to the conclusion that the science of ahadith used by Muslim scholars is a historically reliable method. The opinions of some moron, wannabe expert do not matter at all!

      Liked by 1 person

    • Heathcliff,

      What source makes you believe that a reliable transmitter needs to be known and a Muslim?

      Liked by 1 person

    • “Ibn Ishaq’s work is not accepted blindly“

      Who says it should be? You’re not creating a straw man are you?

      I was looking at the criterion used by historians. No one accepts anything blindly. But nice piece of fiction to create a straw man to break down.

      Perhaps you will answer. What source makes you believe that a reliable transmitter has to be known and a Muslim?

      Like

    • the question is WHO IS THE PERSON ?

      who narrated it ? WHERE DID he hear the story from ? Muslim, non-Muslim WHO?

      Liked by 1 person

    • Heathcliff, exactly, there are legitimate reasons why hadith experts reject this history book i mean you can’t expect someone to accept anything blindly, on top of that i’m pretty sure christians apply this criterion themselves considering the amount of texts that were rejected….i remember reading a quote of our angry friend Robert Spencer saying that Ibn Ishaq is questionable in his opinion…it would be good to mention that Ibn Ishaq was skeptical sometimes about of his own book, infact he himself believed that some of his compilations were fabrications and he did write a book on this subject but apparently the book is lost, i would’ve been great to have it in our hands today….

      Liked by 1 person

    • when the gospel of Mary says that Jesus drank his own spunk/semen, could that be something that REALLY WENT BACK TO THE FIRST CENTURY?

      when it says that jesus drank his own semen , was it EMBARRASING TO the creator. Of the story ??? We’re the stories of the Hindu gods doing filthy stuff EMBARRASING ?

      Paulis, did the story where your god drank his own semen go back to first century?

      Like

    • HEathcliff

      Please answer my question

      What source makes you believe that a reliable transmitter needs to be known and a Muslim?

      Like

    • if it is unknown how do we know it is RELIABLE ? if it is non Muslim, how do we know it is friend of the prophet ?

      Liked by 1 person

    • You aren’t answering the question. What source makes you believe those things?

      Like

  6. More examples of Muhammad’s racist rhetoric:

    Narrated AbudDarda’
    Allah’s Messenger (peace be upon him) said: Allah created Adam when He had to create him and He struck his right shoulder and there emitted from it white offspring as if they were white ants. He struck his left shoulder and there emitted from it the black offspring as if they were charcoal. He then said (to those who had been emitted) from the right (shoulder): For Paradise and I do not mind. Then He said to those (who had been emitted) from his left shoulder: They are for Hell and I do not mind.

    Al-Tirmidhi Hadith – 38

    Like

    • ROTFL!!! This is what happens when a brainless zombie blindly copies from other brainless zombies! The hadith says “as if they were charcoal”! In other words, they were literally black in color! Earth to bad samaritan: “black” people are not literally “black”, idiot!

      This hadith is describing the people of Paradise and the people of Hell. It has nothing to do with skin color or ethnicity or race. Keep it up sammy! There is more embarrassment to come for you!

      Liked by 1 person

    • LOL, well give him a break bro! I mean, he worships an old man who considers him to be a lowly Gentile dog.

      Liked by 1 person

    • It says WHITE offspring and BLACK offspring emitting from Adam.

      In other words white offspring for paradise and black offspring for hell.

      We can read you know. We’re not all illiterate like Mo.

      Nice try.

      Always funny watching Muslims bending over backwards trying to explain away or cover up one of their prophet’s embarrassing quotes or villainy though lol.

      Like

    • Samaritan, don’t expect any answer from me right now because i’m gonna take a nap….i’m literally half asleep and i already debunked two of your weak hadiths😂…bring some more of weak narrations from your collection, i’m gonna deal with them Tomorrow…

      Like

    • Samaritan, thank you once again for exposing yourself because this Hadith is Graded as “Dha’eef” in Al-Arnaa’oot’s revision revision of Imaam Ahmad’s Musnad…you see? That’s why i told you to study hadith science…

      Liked by 2 people

    • Hahahaha! It said WHITE like “WHITE ANTS” and “BLACK” like “CHARCOAL”. You say you know how to read? Hmmm, that’s strange because you just showed that you have difficulty READING the WHOLE statement, not just a couple of words out of context.

      Holy spirit fail!

      Like

  7. LO, Bad Samaritan’s copy and paste job continues! This guy is just another Google scholar, who blindly copies from like-minded Christian propaganda sites. He even copied the reference from Ibn Qayyim, including the page number!

    Calling a guy a ship makes someone “racist”? Mahran was a very strong individual. The hadith says that whenever someone felt “weak”, they would have him carry their things. He had greater strength and stamina than others, so that is why he was called “a ship”. Christian logic strikes again!

    Still waiting for an explanation as to why you worship a Canaanite god who degraded Gentiles? All your brethren have run away from this question, and so are you it seems! Bwahahaha!

    Liked by 1 person

  8. i want to ask what is RACIST about describing hair styles or heads in ways which are easily understood.

    i even see white people have hair styles like this

    at least a humble woman was not called a LITTLE bitch. dogs usually EAT their own vomit and eat their own crap.

    Liked by 2 people

    • Lol are you friggin serious?! You’re even stupider than I thought.

      Go on the streets of LA and call a black person on the street ‘raisin head’or ‘nappy head’. Or someone of Arab or Asian origin a ‘rag head’. Let’s see if they greet you with a handshake or tump you on your jaw.

      There used to be a black footballer from this country who used to tie his dreadlocks up in a bun during matches. Opposition fans started teasing him by singing ‘pineapple head’ every time he touched the ball. What do you think Mr heathcliff, were they being derogatory or was it a term of endearment?

      Like

    • Go on the streets of… well pretty much every street that isn’t in Israel and call the gentiles dogs like your prince of peace did and see if you’ll be met with a handshake.

      Like

    • You just commited the tu quoque fallacy.

      Like

    • Aaam no. Do you even know what the tu quoque fallacy is?
      It basically means two wrongs don’t make a right. But in order to have that I must think that my side is wrong which I clearly demonstrated above isn’t the case. So we have only ONE wrong which is YOUR wrong!
      I’m just pointing out the sheer hypocrisy on your side. You NEVER answer the questions so that’s pretty much all you have really.

      Like

    • Bad samaritan is deathly afraid of explaining why he worships a Canaanite god who considered Gentiles to be lowly dogs! Just like all of his zombie brethren! Christianity has left these idiots with no answers. Hahahaha!

      Like

    • Partridge,

      “”I’m just pointing out the sheer hypocrisy on your side””

      Are you sure YOU know what a tu quoque fallacy is? Because a tu quoque IS an appeal to hypocrisy, dummy.

      Like

  9. So a quick recap.

    According to Islamic sources…

    A) Muhammad kept and traded black slaves.
    B) Muhammad traded two black slaves for one Arab slave, implying that he consider Arab slaves to be worth more.
    C) Muhammad referred to Ethiopians as ‘raisin heads’.
    D) Muhammad described black slaves as ‘pug-noses’
    E) Muhammad claimed Allah created White offspring for paradise and black offspring for hell.

    And according one of the earliest biographies of Mo by Ibn Ishaq.

    F) Muhammad claimed Satan looked like a black man.

    Hmmm all that stuff about Muhammad being a champion for civil rights and way ahead of his time seems a tad silly now doesn’t it?

    Like

    • So to recap:

      Bad Samaritan…

      A) Blindly copied ahadith without understanding their context.
      B) Blindly copied references from Ibn Ishaq, even though Ibn Ishaq is not reliable.
      C) Cannot explain why he worships a Canaanite deity.
      D) Cannot explain why his Canaanite god refers to Gentiles as dogs.
      E) Is obviously a clueless zombie who is way out of his league!

      Hmm, taking this guy and his moronic opinions seriously seems a tad silly, doesn’t it?

      Like

    • Quranblog,

      1) It doesn’t matter where it’s copied from. What matters is the content and whether it’s quotes accurately. Which it is.

      2) So let’s have the context then. What did Muhammad REALLY mean when calling Ethiopians raisin heads, blacks pug-nosed slaves, and his statement about Satan looking like a black man? Educate us, scholar.

      Like

    • Bad samaritan,

      1. Oh it matters, because it shows that you are just an idiot who is not interested in serious research. You just want to find something to justify your idiotic opposition to Islam. So you do what any lazy person does. You use Google and you go to the first non-Muslim website that comes up. You don’t bother to actually read the ahadith. You just copy and paste. No effort is made to see if the hadith is even being interpreted properly, let alone quoted properly! But that’s what Christianity does. It corrupts the mind.

      2. LOL, so you definitely DON’T know how to read. Everyone here has exposed your laughable quotes and interpretations.

      Now, why do you keep running away from these, you coward?

      C) Cannot explain why he worships a Canaanite deity.
      D) Cannot explain why his Canaanite god refers to Gentiles as dogs.

      Come on sammy! Don;t be afraid! What’s the worst that could happen? You will just get embarrassed again. You should be used to that by now!

      Liked by 2 people

    • Yaaay we have found a new ‘joel’ that we can slap around some more. I was getting a bit bored with doing it all the time to joel the troll but thank the Canaanite god for sending us his servant sama to take some of the heat!

      Liked by 2 people

    • “Thank the Canaanite god…” LOL!!!

      Like

    • Quranblog,

      1. I’ve known of such hadiths for a long time now. When i was asked to quote them here i got them from this site: https://muflihun.com/hadith/

      2. You haven’t exposed anything the only thing that’s been exposed here is your prophet’s explicit racist remarks and human exploitation and your Muslim brothers desperate flapping around making nonsensical excuses to try to justify the inexcusable.

      3. I’m still waiting for your exegesis. You keep crying “context!”, now here’s your chance to set the record straight. So I’m going to ask you again. What did your prophet REALLY mean by referring to Ethiopians as raisin heads, blacks as pug-nosed slaves and Satan looking like a black man.

      I await your masterful insight.

      Like

    • O our dear sama is in denial again. When you get spanked you do the only thing that is left for you to do, you repeat your garbage and claim you haven’t been refuted.

      Since you repeat yourself I’ll just repeat my answer and questions which you do not dare to answer cus your a xtian and xtians are cowards.

      He owned Arab slaves as well. Does that now make him racist to Arabs and hence to himself? The Jewish prophets had slaves too. Hell even your god took slavegirls in the OT (which according to you is jesus). So if having slaves makes someone unholy then throw your comicbook known as the bible in the garbage bin.
      He told his believers to hold everyone equal even if it is a Ethiopian which looks like raisin. It’s amazing how you turn everything upside down. He is telling his followers to give the same respect to them as everyone else but yet somehow still is racist to blacks which would imply he thinks that they are lower but at the same time he says to listen and obey them. I know your cult teaches you to believe in logical contradictions and use verbal gymnastics to try and justify those concepts like trinity and your god-man concept but don’t throw that crap at our religion. Keep it to yourself please.

      “I understand you’re upset and disappointed at this discovery but don’t take it out on me”

      You think I didn’t know about these hadits? Dear God, Sama you’re pathetic.

      Answer my questions instead of dodging them: if the devil takes on the form of a black man and when the Prophet points that out then does that make him a racist?
      If the Prophet thinks blacks are satanic then why does he honor Bilal, why does he call a black woman ‘a mother after my mother’, why does he criticize one of his companions for treating a black man poorly for being black, why does he say in his last speech: “All mankind is from Adam and Eve. An Arab has no superiority over a non-Arab, nor does a non-Arab have any superiority over an Arab; a WHITE has no superiority over a BLACK, nor does a BLACK have any superiority over a WHITE; [none have superiority over another] EXCEPT by piety and good action. Learn that every Muslim is a brother to every Muslim and that the Muslims constitute one brotherhood. Nothing shall be legitimate to a Muslim which belongs to a fellow Muslim unless it was given freely and willingly. Do not, therefore, do injustice to yourselves.”

      Now do tell us why your all loving god calls all gentiles dogs?

      You make arguments which bitchslap your own religion. So sad to see a cult getting spit upon by it’s own followers.
      Run sama, run!

      Liked by 1 person

    • Partridge,

      “”He owned Arab slaves as well. Does that now make him racist to Arabs and hence to himself?””

      Hey dipshit, no as has been pointed out to you already, it makes him an exploiter who set a terrible example. The point was Muhammad not only owned and sold black slaves he considered them to be worth less than Arab slaves and ridiculed their racial characteristics. That’s what made him a racist.

      Like

    • 1. LOL, oh sure, sure. We know that you are a loser Google scholar. No use trying to hide it. Your lying spirit has been exposed!

      2 & 3. ROTFL, you are in denial little samaritan. You have been exposed for misquoting and misinterpreting ahadith. For example, I already neutered you on the white and black hadith. The hadith said “black” as “charcoal”. It’s not referring to their skin color! It’s referring to their state as people of Hell. If you weren’t such an ignoramus, you would immediately think of a certain Quranic verse which uses similar imagery when talking about the people of Paradise and Hell. Now show us what a good researcher you are and try to find the verse I am talking about. Go on now! Impress us with your (Google) knowledge.

      Now, why do you keep running away from these, you coward?

      C) Cannot explain why he worships a Canaanite deity.
      D) Cannot explain why his Canaanite god refers to Gentiles as dogs.

      Come on sammy! Don;t be afraid! What’s the worst that could happen? You will just get embarrassed again. You should be used to that by now!

      Like

    • SHITAritan, non-christians say the same about yehowayeuwwuwuww/yahoooooo.com :

      You selectively quoted from Leviticus 25:44-46. Read it for comprehension. It says to not treat fellow Israelites harshly. Then it says that it is OK to treat slaves like a slave. Exodus 21 says you can beat a slave to death if the suffer a while before death because the slave is property.

      Christian sources lie about Bible slavery because it is harsher than their minds can admit.

      Deuteronomy 15:12-14 (NRSV)
      12 If a member of your community, whether a Hebrew man or a Hebrew woman, is sold to you and works for you six years, in the seventh year you shall set that person free. 13 And when you send a male slave out from you a free person, you shall not send him out empty-handed. 14 Provide liberally out of your flock, your threshing floor, and your wine press, thus giving to him some of the bounty with which the Lord your God has blessed you.

      If the slave was an indentured servant, he would be walking out on his final payment. But Leviticus 25:46 would prevent the owner from being harsh with him.

      Leviticus 24:17-22 (NRSV)
      17 Anyone who kills a human being shall be put to death. 18 Anyone who kills an animal shall make restitution for it, life for life. 19 Anyone who maims another shall suffer the same injury in return: 20 fracture for fracture, eye for eye, tooth for tooth; the injury inflicted is the injury to be suffered. 21 One who kills an animal shall make restitution for it; but one who kills a human being shall be put to death. 22 You shall have one law for the alien and for the citizen: for I am the Lord your God.

      Returning a slave to the owner would incur risk so Deuteronomy 24:16-17 relieves the people from that risk. It does not prevent the owner from retrieving to get his property. The slave owner was exempt from these penalties in Exodus, with the only penalties being for beating the slave in the face so as to knock out an eye or a tooth, which would allow the slave to go free, and causing an injury that would cause the slave to die too fast, which would be a head injury, traumatic injury to vital organs, or rapid blood loss.

      I am curious about the vagueness of Exodus 21:21 saying “a day or two”. Since the Jewish day began at sundown, does the owner become free from additional punishment for the death of a slave when the sun goes down?

      Jesus didn’t see anything wrong with beating slaves. Maybe he was against beating them in the face because you might knock out a tooth and have to set the slave free.

      But Jesus sanctioned the beating of slaves which implies that he followed Leviticus 25:44-46, which allows a slave to be treated harshly as long as the slave was a Gentile.

      ::::::::::::
      There are slaves bought with money (usually foreigners), indentured servants (usually Hebrew males). and hired hands. Hired hands got paid at the end of the day. They could come and go when they wanted money. Indentured servants worked for six years and were to be paid generously at the end of their indenture. Slaves were slaves for life, their children belonged to the owner, and they could be left to heirs as property.
      Also, if an indentured servant was given a slave wife, at the end of the indenture, the servant had to decide whether to leave his wife and any children with the owner or to become a permanent slave. The Bible spelled out exactly how to do this. There is nothing in there that says the owner had to advise the consequences of taking a slave wife to the indentured servant, only that he could do it and how to do it. The Bible tells slave masters how to exploit family values.

      :::::::::::::::::
      Slaves were slaves for life, their children belonged to the owner, and they could be left to heirs as property.

      And where in the Bible is there evidence for this?
      Why are you arguing about Bible slavery if you have to ask me this question? You should know this before you go spouting off your uninformed mouth. How many times have you been told to read Leviticus 25:44-46 for comprehension?

      “Slaves were slaves for life” “and they could be left to heirs as property.”

      Leviticus 25:44-46 (NRSV)

      44 As for the male and female slaves whom you may have, it is from the nations around you that you may acquire male and female slaves. 45 You may also acquire them from among the aliens residing with you, and from their families that are with you, who have been born in your land; and they may be your property. 46 You may keep them as a possession for your children after you, for them to inherit as property. These you may treat as slaves, but as for your fellow Israelites, no one shall rule over the other with harshness.
      Of course, the owner could set them free if he chose to do so, they were his property, but there was no requirement to set them free. There are some Jubilee accounts but there is no record of it ever being implemented. It may have been a property grab attempt by the rich.
      “their children belonged to the owner”

      Exodus 21:2-6 (NRSV)

      2 When you buy a male Hebrew slave, he shall serve six years, but in the seventh he shall go out a free person, without debt. 3 If he comes in single, he shall go out single; if he comes in married, then his wife shall go out with him. 4 If his master gives him a wife and she bears him sons or daughters, the wife and her children shall be her master’s and he shall go out alone. 5 But if the slave declares, “I love my master, my wife, and my children; I will not go out a free person,” 6 then his master shall bring him before God. He shall be brought to the door or the doorpost; and his master shall pierce his ear with an awl; and he shall serve him for life.

      Compare that to:

      Deuteronomy 15:12-17 (NRSV)
      12 If a member of your community, whether a Hebrew man or a Hebrew woman, is sold to you and works for you six years, in the seventh year you shall set that person free. 13 And when you send a male slave out from you a free person, you shall not send him out empty-handed. 14 Provide liberally out of your flock, your threshing floor, and your wine press, thus giving to him some of the bounty with which the Lord your God has blessed you. 15 Remember that you were a slave in the land of Egypt, and the Lord your God redeemed you; for this reason I lay this command upon you today. 16 But if he says to you, “I will not go out from you,” because he loves you and your household, since he is well off with you, 17 then you shall take an awl and thrust it through his earlobe into the door, and he shall be your slave forever.

      You shall do the same with regard to your female slave.
      Why didn’t your Christian website not tell you this? Why didn’t you believe me? You are getting the truth about what the Bible says with no sugar-coating.

      Like

    • “The point was Muhammad not only owned and sold black slaves he considered them to be worth less than Arab slaves”

      Hey dipshit then answer why you contradict:
      “All mankind is from Adam and Eve. An Arab has no superiority over a non-Arab, nor does a non-Arab have any superiority over an Arab; a WHITE has no superiority over a BLACK, nor does a BLACK have any superiority over a WHITE; [none have superiority over another] EXCEPT by piety and good action. Learn that every Muslim is a brother to every Muslim and that the Muslims constitute one brotherhood. Nothing shall be legitimate to a Muslim which belongs to a fellow Muslim unless it was given freely and willingly. Do not, therefore, do injustice to yourselves.”

      Now use the same skepticism and answer us why your prince of peace calls gentiles dogs.

      Liked by 1 person

    • “no as has been pointed out to you already, it makes him an exploiter who set a terrible example”

      Well thank you for trashing your own cult cus that includes even jesus himself who had slaves according to the OT cus 32 slavegirls were given to the lord (what ever the hell he plans to do with them)! Now we can clearly see that you spit on your bible just to score a cheap debate point against Islam.

      You’re trash!

      Liked by 1 person

    • 1) Do you think everybody is as stupid as you? You keep zooming into the word Charcoal, as if that’s going to distract from the rest of the passage. What part of the WHITE OFFSPRING of Adam for paradise & BLACK OFFSPRING of Adam for hell are you failing to comprehend?

      2) I see you’re evading offering your expert exegesis again. Lame. In future don’t pull people up with shouts of “context!” like a little weasel and you won’t get called out to back it up.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Satan is a black man and the inhabitants of hell are describes as black people but according to ibn Sow these have nothing to do with being black?

      Hey Ibn Sow, are you a black man?

      Like

    • “1) Do you think everybody is as stupid as you? You keep zooming into the word Charcoal, as if that’s going to distract from the rest of the passage. What part of the WHITE OFFSPRING of Adam for paradise & BLACK OFFSPRING of Adam for hell are you failing to comprehend?

      2) I see you’re evading offering your expert exegesis again. Lame. In future don’t pull people up with shouts of “context!” like a little weasel and you won’t get called out to back it up.”

      LOL, bad samaritan has no answers so he keeps repeating the same nonsense. That’s how brainless Christians operate.

      1) The word “charcoal” is important idiot because it is describing what these people look like. The color of charcoal is literally “black”. How many people do you know who can be described as literally “black”? This hadith is not talking about race. It is talking about the people of Paradise and the people of Hell. I asked you to do your Google research and find a certain Quranic verse which talks about this as well. Did you find it, loser? Why are you ignoring this? Afraid of being exposed again? 😉

      2) LOL, you got whooped just like all of your lying brethren! You completely misinterpreted the hadith, ignoring its CONTEXT, which is talking about the people of Hell and how they will appear. Try to put two and two together, stupid. I know it’s hard for you trinitarians, but try anyway. When fire burns something, what happens to it? It turns black, doesn’t it? Try to use your head, or what’s left of it anyway. The longer you remain a Christian, the more brain damage that occurs.

      Like

    • “Satan is a black man and the inhabitants of hell are describes as black people but according to ibn Sow these have nothing to do with being black?

      Hey Ibn Sow, are you a black man?”

      Hey Cerbie, back for ANOTHER neutering? What are you, a masochist?

      LOL, your brethren in idiocy already got schooled on this matter. Are you taking a whack at it just to save face? You really enjoy being humiliated, don’t you?

      By the way, why do you say “Ibn”? Do you assume that I am an Arab, you loser? Like you assumed I lived in Australia? 😉

      And no, I’m not a black man either.

      It has already been established in Islam, my little neutered friend, that God does not look at the color of someone’s skin. He looks at their deeds. That is why the Prophet stated that white people do not have superiority over black people or Arabs over non-Arabs, EXCEPT by piety and good deeds. That is why a black man, Bilal, was chosen as the first muezzin. He was an African Muslim, but his color did not matter to his Muslim brethren. What mattered was that he was a Muslim.

      In contrast, your Canaanite god referred to Gentiles as dogs. You see, Cerbie? To your god, you are a lowly mutt! I know that must hurt, but blame your god.

      Like

    • Hey Paulis , do you APPLY the criteria on every STORY IN the Hebrew bible? Remember, you bible admits that yhwhs prophets were rapists, liars, adulterers, hypocrites, IDOL FOKIN WORSHIPPERS, ETC ETC

      HOW CAN YOU TRUST any thing in HEBREW BIBLE applying criteria of DISSIMILARITY AND EMBARRASMENT

      YOU COULD END UP becoming a multi universe worshipping atheist (get it multi person/multi universe?)

      You kristians are a DISEASE . a disease which is dying .

      Like

    • Hey Ibn Sow, can you please explain to heathcliff that Christians don’t believe the prophets were sinless. Clearly he has no idea and since you’re an expert on Hebrew…

      Like

    • “It has already been established in Islam“

      Translation- “I already have my conclusion on this topic so I will need to reinterpret every Hadith that contradicts my position.”

      I could care less what your school of thought is. That says nothing about your failing attempts to change the plain meaning of your own sources. Of course Muslims will try to explain away anything that makes their beloved prophet look bad. Doesn’t mean you are very successful at it. And thankfully, the majority of Muslims aren’t as radical as you in their stubborn stupidity and are leaving Islam in droves

      It’s good to see Islam going through this epoch of rediscovering the sources. You’ll be better off for it (well, probably not people like you who clearly have addiction to control and power)

      Like

    • Sinners who were TRANSMITTERS OF word of god ? Which MODERN DAY CRITERIA DO YOU EMPLOY TO ESTABLISH what is bs and what is truth in the hb ? Remember HB is written by UNKNOWNS . you don’t know who these people are.

      Like

    • “Leaving Islam in droves….”that’s what a fristians scum bag says every year.

      hmmmm that reminds me. When Matthew says “some DOUBTED” could that be a cover up for even greater apostacies ?

      Like

    • “Translation- “I already have my conclusion on this topic so I will need to reinterpret every Hadith that contradicts my position.”

      I could care less what your school of thought is. That says nothing about your failing attempts to change the plain meaning of your own sources. Of course Muslims will try to explain away anything that makes their beloved prophet look bad. Doesn’t mean you are very successful at it. And thankfully, the majority of Muslims aren’t as radical as you in their stubborn stupidity and are leaving Islam in droves”

      LOL, we have an authentic hadith, not to mention clear statements from the Quran, which states that one’s skin color is not what God looks at. This is established in Islam. Your opinions don’t matter, silly dog!

      Muslims are leaving Islam in droves, you say? That’s rich! How do you know that Cerbie? Did you Canaanite god tell you that?

      In actual fact, it’s Christians who are leaving in droves. And I mean DROVES! Seriously, your religion produces MILLIONS UPON MILLIONS of apostates. There have been scientific studies done that have demonstrated this indisputable fact. You see, Cerbie. Not all former Christians are as brainwashed as you are. They realized that they were deceived by your false religion. They realized that the Bible is a fraudulent book. They realized that you worship a false god. Christianity is dying a slow and painful death. The only places where it is still able to get converts is in less educated places. Ignorant people can be duped into converting to your silly religion. But educated, who actually read the Bible beforehand, know that your religion is one big con.

      Liked by 2 people

  10. “Go on the streets of LA and call a black person on the street ‘raisin head’or ‘nappy head’.”

    you dumb son of b it was not a nappy which holds SHIT in it.

    it was a DESCRIPTION of a person in the position of a CHIEF . that would should obey such a person even if one THINKS his head is BETTER .

    the person should not think, “he is an ETHIOPIAN and i am an arab, why should i obey an ethiopian LOOK at him”

    this is the point the hadeeth is trying to get across, but dumb son of a B*TCH like you just doesnt get it .

    you said “black person”

    since when did the hadeeth say ALL black people have head like raisin .

    ” Or someone of Arab or Asian origin a ‘rag head’. Let’s see if they greet you with a handshake or tump you on your jaw.”

    if someone has a HAIR style like a RAISIN and i say DESCRIBE that style AM i racist ?


    There used to be a black footballer from this country who used to tie his dreadlocks up in a bun during matches.”

    if i said “shit locks ” or “shit head” that would be insult, but what is RACIST ABOUT describing the style as a FRUIT which MATCHES the style?

    the STYLE .


    Opposition fans started teasing him by singing ‘pineapple head’ every time he touched the ball. What do you think Mr heathcliff, were they being derogatory or was it a term of endearment?”

    NOW LET ME FUCK YOU UP

    quote :

    There is no question that this was intended as an insult. Not even conservative scholars dispute this. I don’t know how it could be a *positive* metaphor anymore than calling someone a pig would somehow be positive.

    Within the context of the story, Jesus is impressed by the woman because of her wit. She turns the insult back on him and this causes him to change his mind. You should point out that in Matthew 15:24, Jesus says “I was sent only for the lost sheep of Israel,” and in Matthew 10:6 he tells his disciples not to go to Samaritans or Gentiles, but “only to the lost sheep of Israel.”

    Jeus seems to have been a Jewish Supremacist, not a universalist. He called Gentiles “pigs” and “dogs” and told his disciples not to go to them. The Gospels also never have Jesus going into any Gentile cities.

    i have a question

    1. why did jesus tell the NON – jewish woman that she is an ANIMAL and HUMANS GET FED FIRST ???

    Like


    • Opposition fans started teasing him by singing ‘pineapple head’ every time he touched the ball. What do you think Mr heathcliff, were they being derogatory or was it a term of endearment?”

      this is NAME calling .

      name-calling
      noun
      abusive language or insults.

      on the OTHER HAND HOW did you derive from the hadeeth that it was name CALLING ?

      OR MOCKING ?

      Listen and obey (your chief) even if an Ethiopian whose head is like a raisin were made your chief

      how did you derive from this that it was NAME calling ?

      Like

    • I don’t think Muhammad needed to make such a derogatory remark to make his point. Spin it anyway you want, but he’s clearly making a racist slur.

      It’s like saying “respect all chiefs equally, even if it’s one of those Indians who smell of curry.”

      Completely unnecessary.

      No differnent if I said “lets be fair to everyone on this blog, even that mr Heathcliff and his melon head containing his grape sized brain”

      Like

    • I see you’re not too bright, Mr ‘what’s racist about describing someone’s features as a fruit, fruits are nice and tasty’ Heathcliff.

      “””” “this is NAME calling” “”””

      So is calling someone a nappy head or rag head. It still has a racist connotation. How are you not getting this?

      Like

  11. hey christians

    WHY DID jeebus TELL THE non-jewish woman that HUMANS get FED FIRST , ANIMALS after?????

    “let the HUMANS/children FIRST be fed….”

    you SONS OF BITCHES HAVE NO STANDARD TO EVEN JUDGE RACISM LEAVE ALONE DESCRIBING HAIR OR HEAD STYLE.

    Like

  12. “I see you’re not too bright, Mr ‘what’s racist about describing someone’s features as a fruit, fruits are nice and tasty’ Heathcliff.”

    noun
    a derogatory or disrespectful nickname for a racial group, used without restraint

    right, so show some evidence that the prophet called the people in a mocking way “raisin heads”
    that he POINTED AT them and said ‘hahaha look melon head…. raisin head…”

    jesus CALLED a non-jew an ANIMAL which gets FED after humans get fed

    you will not spin this because you know jesus was RACIST .

    jesus was BEING insulting . jesus was being unneigborly

    jesus took on the FEATURES and skin color of a jew. the same people who REJECTED prophets, your god took on their SKIN colour.

    why didn’t he come down as a black african ? your god commands the MASSACRE of non-jews .

    “Listen and obey (your chief) even if an Ethiopian whose head is like a raisin were made your chief”

    Narated By Anas bin Malik : The Prophet said to Abu-Dhar, “Listen and obey (your chief) even if he is an Ethiopian with a head like a raisin.”

    you tell me what is RACIST about this?

    Narated By Anas bin Malik : Allah’s Apostle said, “You should listen to and obey, your ruler even if he was an Ethiopian (black) slave whose head looks like a raisin.”

    you tell me what is RACIST about this?

    Like

    • the indication seems to be not all ethiopians have RAISIN heads.not all blacks have the same style. if you see a style which is a raisin style, even that people, if he becomes your chief, one must listen to…

      Like

    • “you tell me what is RACIST about this?”

      Not even sure of you’re just trolling at this stage.

      But seriously.

      “even if an Ethiopian whose head is like a raisin were made your chief”

      Do I really have to explain to you the racist connotation of this statement? I mean really?!

      “even if an Ghanaian whose lips are like rubber tyres were made your chief”

      ☝️I suppose this isn’t racist either?

      Like

    • you are a shitaritan

      style of hair . colour of hair

      this shitritan

      Like

    • “even if an Ghanaian whose lips are like rubber tyres were made your chief”

      dear arsehole, if the ghanian had red afro, how would you identify him among ghanians who did not have red afro?

      Like

    • The Ghanaian with red hair, obviously.

      What a stupid question.

      Like

  13. quote :
    It’s like saying “respect all chiefs equally, even if it’s one of those Indians who smell of curry.”

    if the indian has red coloured hair, you would say “red head ”
    if you called him SMELLY indian , i guess now we are talking different things .

    Like

    • No thinks ‘redneck’ is racist. Everyone says it all the time. It’s all about what the current political view is.
      This is one of the simplest tricks in the book that only low IQ idiots fall for. When ‘redneck’ will become a new boogeyword then that will be considered racist and everyone when will look back at people living today and call us racists. Such a moronic concept!

      Liked by 1 person

    • No one** thinks…

      Liked by 1 person

    • “if the indian has red coloured hair, you would say “red head ”

      An Ethiopians tend to have black hair, why not say “black haired Ethiopian”?

      Like

  14. “lets be fair to everyone on this blog, even that mr Heathcliff and his melon head containing his grape sized brain”

    look at those hadeeths carefully and tell me if this is the MOCKERY which is being DERIVED from it.
    this is insult and name calling , yet this is not derived from the hadeeth.

    here they are again :

    “Listen and obey (your chief) even if an Ethiopian whose head is like a raisin were made your chief”

    Narated By Anas bin Malik : The Prophet said to Abu-Dhar, “Listen and obey (your chief) even if he is an Ethiopian with a head like a raisin.”

    you tell me what is RACIST about this?

    Narated By Anas bin Malik : Allah’s Apostle said, “You should listen to and obey, your ruler even if he was an Ethiopian (black) slave whose head looks like a raisin.”

    you tell me what is RACIST about this?

    Like

    • “Even if a black person with a microphone head were chief”

      This wouldn’t be racist either according to your reasoning lol

      Sorry if you refuse to see why calling an Ethiopian a raisin head is racist then I can’t help you. You’re simply in denial.

      Like

    • Samaritan thinks that people in 7th century Arabia used terms like raisin head, towel head, muscle head, etc.

      Like

    • Kmak,

      We have evidence in sahih hadiths from 7th century Arabia of your prophet using the term raisin head. Do keep up.

      Like

    • Samaritan: We have evidence in sahih hadiths from 7th century Arabia of your prophet using the term raisin head. Do keep up.

      Lol. Yeah, Muhammad(saw) used an American expression.

      Like

    • “We have evidence in sahih hadiths from 7th century Arabia of your prophet using the term raisin head. Do keep up.”

      LOL, so now the hadiths are from the 7th century? But don’t you Christians argue that the hadiths are not historically reliable because they were compiled centuries later? Christians and consistency…like positively charged ions. One repels the other. Another holy spirit fail!

      Like

    • Since Samaritan is an imbecile, let me break down my argument. Raisin head is an American expression. There was no America in the 7th century. Therefore, the Prophet could not have used this expression.

      Like

  15. Cerbie the neutered dog of hell said:

    “Who says it should be? You’re not creating a straw man are you?

    I was looking at the criterion used by historians. No one accepts anything blindly. But nice piece of fiction to create a straw man to break down.

    Perhaps you will answer. What source makes you believe that a reliable transmitter has to be known and a Muslim?”

    LOL, you idiots use Ibn Ishaq when it suits your purpose, Cerbie. You are not using “the criterion used by historians”. Like I said, ACTUAL historians like Harald Motzki have verified the reliability of using an isnaad. This stuff is WAY out of your league.

    Hmm, let’s see why a non-Muslim might not be reliable. Hmmm, oh man. This is such a puzzle. Oh wait, I know! What if it was some non-Muslim moron named Paulus (also known to his friends as Cerberus or Cerbie) who wanted to stop the growth of Islam and so started spreading a false story to deceive people?

    And by the way, there were some Muslims who were rejected as hadith transmitters too. It could have been due to the fact that they were known to make mistakes in remembering things or that they embellished or maybe even fabricated some stories for various reasons. There were also some people who pretended to be Muslims and tried to spread false stories.

    Like

    • Please answer my question. It shouldn’t be difficult.

      “What source makes you believe that a reliable transmitter has to be known and a Muslim?”

      Like

  16. “Hey Ibn Sow, can you please explain to heathcliff that Christians don’t believe the prophets were sinless. Clearly he has no idea and since you’re an expert on Hebrew…”

    Hey Cerbie, saying they were not “sinless” is an understatement! They were some of the WORST sinners in history. There are atheists who are better people than your Biblical prophets!

    Cerbie, do you know that your religion does not recognize that God sent non-Jewish prophets? Why was your Canaanite god such a racist?

    Liked by 1 person

    • So what was Abraham then? Haha

      You really are stupid.

      But by all means please give me the names of all
      The non Jewish prophets mentioned in the Koran that weren’t already mentioned in the bible. Let’s start with Japan. What was the name of the Islamic prophet Allah sent to Japan? Don’t know? Ok, how about Latin America. What was the name of the prophets Allah sent there? Don’t know?

      And now we’ve so easily falsified the Koran again for claiming to be a complete book. Well done ibn Sow- your mum must be so proud of you pretending to be an expert on everything

      Like

    • LOL, so the progenitor of the Hebrews is a prophet! Big deal!

      You are really stupid. That neutering must have affected your head.

      You want the names of some non-Jewish prophets? Hmm, let’s see. Well, there are Hud and Salih (pbut) and of course Muhammad (pbuh). Obviously, there aren’t any Japanese or Latino prophet mentioned, idiot. LOL, you think your silly little challenge proves anything? If the Quran did mention a Japanese prophet, how do you think the name would sound in Arabic? Do you think it will appear Japanese?

      But we do know from the Quran that God sent messengers to every nation. This is clearly stated, so we can be certain that there were Japanese, Latino, Chinese, Aborigine etc. prophets. In contrast, your racist god only chose Hebrew prophets. What a racist Canaanite!

      Liked by 1 person

    • Ha what a tantrum! First there are no non Jewish prophets. Then you are proved wrong and it’s “big deal”. Loser

      Hud? You mean the descendant of Noah who is also biblical and non Jewish. Strike two ibn Sow.

      So the only prophets your silly prophet knew about were either fellow Arabs or biblical ones? How then did he know that a prophet visited Alaska, Japan, Serbia, or England? Only a clown would believe such an idiotic notion like that. Look I’ll give you one last chance- give me the name of the prophet Allah sent to Australia. C’mon muhammadan, don’t let Allah down now.

      Like

    • ROTFL, the fool can’t admit that his Canaanite god is a racist!

      Where is Noah referred to as a prophet in the Bible, idiot? Go on, go to your pathetic jumble of a book and show me where it says “the prophet Noah…”

      You asked for non-Jewish prophets in the Quran. I gave you their names. But, not surprisingly, being incapable of admitting when you are wrong, you just repeat the same asinine question!

      Like

    • The neutered dog knows that his Canaanite god sent Hebrew prophets only, so he has to try to level the playing field by asking for the names of non-Arab or non-Jewish prophets in the Quran! Talk about desperation!

      It’s not a surprise that your old man from Canaan sent only Jewish prophets. Jews were also Canaanites. Yahweh was a national god of Canaan, not the One True God.

      Like

    • Look, you’re the one who introduced this topic. You were proven wrong. I thought you might find the stupidity of the topic relevant if you applied it to Islam. Apparently not.

      Now you seem to be confusing Quranic narrative with the bible. We believe God chose the Jews to be his holy people to then be a blessing to the nations. This began with abram and continued in the new covenant. Why then would it be a surprise to see Jewish prophets?

      You, stupidly, believe that Allah sent a prophet to Japan, New Zealand, Ethiopia and New Guinea. But you can’t name them or demonstrate that this even ever happened. This is to somehow redeem your prophets racism. You’re clearly getting desperate. Take a break kid and leave your basement for a while.

      Like

    • Your Canaanite god chose Canaanites as his “chosen people”? Hmm, sounds fishy doesn’t it?

      Your pathetic argument that there are no Japanese prophets mentioned in the Quran is what I said it was, a pathetic attempt to level the playing field. The fact is that the Quran makes a clear statement that prophets were sent to all nations. It also says that only some have been mentioned.

      In contrast, your god neglected all other races and ethnicities, leaving them to practice false religions, and then all of a sudden sends his Jewish “son” (which is actually himself) to preach to the whole world? Hahahaha, what kind of idiotic religion do you follow?

      Like

    • I don’t need to level the playing field. The bible is clear from the get go that God would choose the Jews as his holy people to be a blessing to the nations. That is stated from Abraham through Moses through to Jesus. But I wouldn’t expect you to have studied or understood, let alone give fair hearing to covenantal theology.

      You, however, have to justify Muhammad’s racism by appealing to an idea that Allah sent a prophet to every nation. Since Allah claims to have done that why is it so hard to tell me the Zimbabwean prophet’s name or the aboriginal prophet’s name? Because it’s nonsense. It never happened. And you are clearly too stubborn to ever see the faults in the musings of an uneducated 7th century Arab.

      Like

    • LOL, yes the Bible says that and the reason is that the Bible was written by Jews for Jews. Yahweh is treated as a tribal god. That is precisely why your Canaanite god did not choose Gentiles. He was the god of the Israelites. Thank you for proving my point!

      Like

    • Cerbie’s stupidity knows no bounds! A prophet from Zimbabwe? Oh the hilarity! Did Zimbabwe exist as a country in ancient times? When the Quran says “nation”, it doesn’t separate countries, moron! It means different groups of people. So for example, the Arabs are a “nation”. So are the “Israelites”. So are the “Africans”. These are all “nations”. Get it now Cerbie? Haven’t you had enough of being neutered?

      Like

    • That’s fine. I was trying to help you out because there are more people groups with different languages than there are nations. So you’ve just made Allah’s little claim even harder to prove. I thought by isolating it to modern nations you might be able to substantiate your claim.

      So instead of now needing to provide a solitary prophet for Indonesia, you now need to provide several hundred for that one nation.

      But, look, I’ll let you and your little god off the hook if you can just provide me with the aboriginal prophet. C’mon Porky, don’t be such a cry baby. Defend your god and prophet!! It’s only one prophet after all.

      Like

    • “That is precisely why your Canaanite god did not choose Gentiles“

      Hmm, except He did. There are even a couple of biblical books named after certain gentiles. Do you think you can name one?

      So now you have two kindergarten challenges. Name the aboriginal prophet, as per your gods claim, lest you falsify the Koran, and then, two, name one book from the biblical canon named after a gentile.

      Like

    • Cerbie’s neutering has taken a definite toll on his intellectual capacities! Where does it say that a Gentile like Job was a prophet? Are you really playing this game? Come now, loser. Show me where it says that Noah was a prophet. Show me where it says that Job was a prophet. Defend your racist Canaanite god!

      Face it, Cerbie. Your god was a tribal god. One needs only read your Bible to see that. Yahweh is repeatedly referred to as the “God of Israel”. In contrast, Allah (swt) is the “Lord of the Worlds”. He is not a tribal god, like your old man from Canaan.

      Like

    • ” We believe God chose the Jews to be his holy people to then be a blessing to the nations.”

      and the racist writer of isaiah says that all people will have to go to A RACE to know about god of the universe? why?

      jews till this day think they are the chosen race.

      in the time of moses and abraham, god did not SEND one person to the non-jewish people for GUIDANCE. if god DID NOT have land GRAB on his mind, maybe the non-jewish CHILDREN who he told to MASSACRE would grow up having “greater faith” than “all of israel”

      you worship a racist god and TILL today the jews think that it is ONLY their RACE which god has CHOSEN to make himself known. yes, you have SUCKED the racism of the hebrews.

      Like

  17. “LOL, we have an authentic hadith, not to mention clear statements from the Quran, which states that one’s skin color is not what God looks at.“

    What’s your point? Doesn’t mean that you don’t equally have other contradictory hadiths demonstrating racism from your prophet.

    And so you are forced to reinterpret the plain meaning of those Hadith to fit your predetermined position. And your attempts to harmonise them are clearly lack any substance or logical cohesion.

    Plus, I’m still waiting for you to disclose your source for believing that a reliable transmitter must be known and a Muslim? What’s the source?

    Like

    • LOL, you keep proving over and over again that you are a novice and completely ignorant. First of all, not all of the ahadith that have been mentioned are considered authentic. Second, there is no racism in those ahadith at all, nor were they ever interpreted that way. But along come you idiots who think you know better than Muslims and tell us that these ahadith are “racist”. LOL!! Who cares what a bunch of clowns think?

      As I said, we have the Quran and authentic ahadith which completely eliminate racism. If there are other ahadith, they are interpreted in the light of these authentic sources.

      A reliable source for transmitting ahadith has to be a Muslim. It doesn’t take a PhD to figure that out. The Prophet told his followers to transmit ahadith so that those who were present could tell those who were not present (i.e. future generations) about his teachings. Who were his followers? Come on, Cerbie, think! They were…Mus…Musli…Muslims! See, you got it!

      Liked by 2 people

    • Oh my God…. Our dear friends talking about interpretation when they can’t digest the fact that Jesus literally called someone a dog…piles of theories, explanations and interpretations have been written to “hide” his “racism”…sorry if i’m rude by the way…

      Liked by 1 person

    • “The Prophet told his followers to transmit ahadith so that those who were present”

      How do you know your prophet said that? From another Hadith? In other words, the historical criterion used to establish Islam is cicular. The criterion used to verify a Hadith comes from the very thing one is trying to establish is true. Ergo, completely irrational.

      Why do you honestly try to defend such nonsense. Thanks again for falsifying Islam. The shame your comments bring to your community is astounding. You really should stay within the masjid where you don’t continually expose how weak Islam’s flu dationsrwally are

      Like

    • Paulus, how is it circular by the way?

      Like

    • LOL, this is so adorable! Cerbie is trying to act like an actual historian! Like I said, you canine clown, REAL historians have shown the reliability of the hadith sciences. Look up Harald Motzki, you moron.

      The hadith about the Prophet telling his followers to transmit his teachings has been vigorously authenticated. Just because you are too stupid to realize that is not my problem.

      Of course, all this historical skepticism that you are engaging in would not be applied to your jumble of a book called the Bible. Christians and consistency are like two positively charged ions. They repel each other! But unfortunately for you, while historians generally accept Islamic sources for their reliability, they have found major problems with your Bible. I know it hurts, but that is the truth. It’s no wonder that MILLIONS of Christians leave your insane religion every year! Hahahaha!

      Liked by 1 person

    • Paulus, i’m not an expert and this is not an answer that anyone can find by googling, but apparently this system started due to the civil war but i’m not sure…maybe you should ask an expert on this subject and there’re some excellent websites that can help you know more about this…

      Like

    • Shad.

      It is circular because the criterion to authenticate the ahadith comes from the ahadith. Consider…

      1. How we do know a Hadith is true? From the isnaad.

      2. How do we know the isnaad is a reliable criterion? Because the ahadith tells us it is.

      3. Bit how do we know the ahadith is true ?

      And on and on…

      You can’t prove the truth of A by appeal to A. That’s called assuming the conclusion into the premise and is rejected as illogical.

      Ibn Sow knows this is the logical case so has avoided the discussion entirely.

      Like

    • Paulus, no my brother i think there’s some type of misunderstanding concerning point number 2 and i guess this is why i was confused by your comments….the”Isnaad” or in other words the “Sanad” is simply the “Chain of Narration” and the reliability of the Isnaad is judged by analyzing the narrators…if the chain of narration is reliable, then the hadith is considered as authentic…

      Like

    • Paulus, i forgot to mention that there should be a well connected chain as well…

      Like

    • Paulus, by the way i was trying to find an answer to your question a few hours back which is really not easy for me to find due to fact that there’s a lack of English books concerning Hadith studies, a friend of mine traces this concept to a well known man who lived around the time of the Rashidun caliphate…it’s not yet confirmed by the way, i’m waiting for more answers

      Like

    • Paulus, i mean i’m waiting for more answers from my friends…

      Like

    • The last person in the isnaad chain is the one who tells the names and then they get written down by hadith collectors. If that last person is reliable (which the hadith collector obviously first verifies) then that makes his isnaad reliability strong. Then it’s a case about whether there are memorization mistakes, etc.
      The hadith science is the best way of having an idea of what the oral tradition was about. If you can come up with a better one then let us know.

      Liked by 2 people

    • partride, i agree

      1. transmitter of narration NAMES his source /teacher until it goes ALL the way BACK to the prophet

      hadeeth science needs to find out narrators living in different locations

      it NEEDS TO know METHOD of reception

      was it DIRECT hearing , personal contact or in some other way?

      this implies that the method of luke was not employed. luke doesnt tell us how he knows what he knows. it is simply TRADITION . and guess word

      “maybe…”

      “probably”

      Liked by 2 people

    • Shaad

      You are misunderstanding. My point two could be expanded or reworded to ask the question- where does the criterion for a known Muslim to be the narrator come from? If the criterion for demonstrating the accuracy of ahadith itself comes from the aHadith, then it is circular. I understand what the isnaad is and how it is analysed.

      So, my question for a while now has been simple. Muslims believe a transmitter must be a Muslim and known. Where is this found in the Islamic sources?

      Like

    • Paulus,

      “If the criterion for demonstrating the accuracy of ahadith itself comes from the ahadith, then it is circular.”

      Brother, I think i’ve probably found out where the confusion is coming from , you must first understand that a Hadith constitutes of “two parts”, first comes the “Isnaad”(Part A) then comes the “Matn”(Part B), so in order to authenticate the Part B we must analyze Part A first, so i don’t see how exactly it is circular…maybe you’re talking about the procedures that occurs after the authentication of the Chain of Narration, well that is necessary as well due to the fact that human error and mistakes may happen even though the Chain is strong, for example i heard there’s a Hadith with a Sahih Chain which says that creation took place in 7 days, so how do we know that the Narrator didn’t make any mistake? The Narrator is Human right? Mistakes can happen, so inorder to know whether there were mistakes, hadith experts will have to compare the “Matn” with the Quran and Authentic Hadiths then we will see that there was indeed a mistake about the days of Creation…the same could be said about Hadiths that talks about History, let us assume that there’s a Hadith which has a Strong Chain says that “9/11 never took place” or “Germany won the 2010 world cup”, then i guess we’ve got a major problem with the narrator…

      You said…

      “Muslims believe a transmitter must be a Muslim and known. Where is this found in the Islamic sources”

      I’m still waiting for an answer from my friends, they are too busy with their job it seems, i think you’ll have to ask an expert for the time being….but i don’t understand why you want to know the sources instead of the logic behind this methodology…for example we can’t expect a christian to accept a narration of Jesus from a Hindu due to the fact that the latter may have a hidden agenda against Christ…To kinda give an answer to your question, as far as i know this meticulous methodology was common among early hadith scholars, some say that this system was inspired by that of Abu Bakr, the latter used to collect hadiths and he had his own system for that…others say this methodology was inspired by the advice of Ibn Sirin, a respected person who used to live around the time of the Rashidun Caliphate if i’m not mistaken…if i could understand Arabic i would have been able to give you a proper answer because all the best books about Hadith science are in Arabic instead of English…an expert would be able to help you…

      Like

    • And this is how the crosstians will always treat the truth. These xtian scum are the most hypocritical pieces of **** I have EVER come across. They lie and lie and hide the shit in their comicbook. The tribe’s men got executed for their treason. They broker the treaty TWICE. You pagan god ordered the Israelites to kill all men, women, childeren/infants and livestock for breaking exactly ZERO treaties.
      Welcome to crosstianity. The religion of horseshit!!!

      Like

    • Meant to post that somewhere else.

      Liked by 1 person

  18. the homosexual foggot male jew worshipping crap wrote :

    “Jesus taught us to love others as we love ourselves ”

    LOL you dumb piece of shit . jesus taught christians to HATE life, parents , WIFE , CHILDREN , brothers and sisters.

    if you say “hate” means “LOVE LESS”

    than how the do you know “love” does not mean “hate less” LOL

    jesus told his pals to ABANDOM THEIR FAMILIES and join him

    jesus DID NOT GIVE a SHIT about what HAPPENED TO MOTHER AND FATHER of his disciples

    look at mark 10:28

    jesus says that he has come to DIVIDE, BRING SWORD , CAUSE FIRE BETWEEN women AND men

    brother and sister

    husband and wife

    he doesn’t give a shit about MENSTRUATING women


    – menstruation is painful for women, so no causing pain for our own gratification contravenes the greatest commandment, imbecile.”

    maybe your wife is horny and wants it? maybe your wife enjoys having it even when she is in pain? jesus did tell women “do not resist”

    Like

  19. Oh my God, this is escalating…😂

    Like

  20. Coco the flying chandelier monkey said:

    “You pervert, you just can’t stop prying into the sex lives of strangers! LOL!!

    Jesus taught us to love others as we love ourselves – menstruation is painful for women, so no causing pain for our own gratification contravenes the greatest commandment, imbecile.

    Anyways, your prophet was a racist who despised blacks, asiatic turks and jews. He drank camel’s piss and was turned on by a six-year old. No wonder you are obsessed with other men”s sex lives.

    You are a tampax.”

    LOL, the little perverted monkey’s obsession with women’s tampons is out of control!

    This is just too precious! You are obviously clueless about women’s sexuality, you moron! First of all, many women say that sex during menstruation is actually very enjoyable. Second, you tried to dance around the question yet again and did not answer it! I am not interested in your personal opinions, idiot. I want you to tell me whether it is allowed for Christian husbands to have intercourse when their wives are menstruating. Your idiotic answer just shows that you are unaware of women’s sexuality. You are an imbecile and clearly have some growing up to do! Get yourself educated first, little chimp! You are embarrassing yourself!

    You are trapped, little flying chimp. You know your religion has no answers so you make up your own opinions. How pathetic! Your Canaanite god didn’t say to the Israelites to avoid sex during menstruation because it may cause pain to the woman. He said not to do it because it would make the man impure. You are a lying imbecile!

    Liked by 1 person

    • “Your Canaanite god didn’t say to the Israelites to avoid sex during menstruation because it may cause pain to the woman. He said not to do it because it would make the man impure. You are a lying imbecile!”

      the guy is a complete and utter nut case. yhwh is pure and holy , obviously menstrual blood is unholy and being near menstrual woman will put contagion in the air. contaminating other hebrews thereby contaminating yhwh himself. yhwh is a holy god.

      Liked by 1 person

    • faiz is right

      QUOTE :

      The priestly law code’s torahs, therefore, are “to distinguish between the holy and the profane, between the impure and the pure” in matters of:

      diet (Lev 11)
      women, i.e., menstruation, childbirth (Lev 12)
      skin diseases and afflictions (Lev 13-14)
      emissions of the flesh (Lev 15)
      sex (Lev 18)
      miscellaneous matters (Lev 19-20)
      the Aaronid priesthood (Lev 21-22)

      the lying piglet called joelyn completely made up his BS

      “You shall be holy because I, Yahweh your god, am holy” is the refrain used by the priestly writers throughout the book of Leviticus. Failure to maintain this holiness puts the deity and all the community’s sacred space at risk since impurity or uncleanliness was deemed contagious.

      LOL LLLOLL OL OL LL LLLO LL L

      Liked by 1 person

    • Where’d you go Coco? Ran away again after your humiliation?

      Like

    • qb

      “First of all, many women say that sex during menstruation is actually very enjoyable. “

      LOL!!! Yes, that’s what ISIS report I hear!!! You are a menstruation boy – look dude, if you want to disobey your prophet and have sex with your wife when she is menstruating then far be it from me to stop you!

      After all, your prophet DISOBEYED the clear command of his goat god to STAY AWAY from menstruating wives and recited the quran inches away from menstrual blood.

      Poor tampax boy, you have taken another beating!!

      As for women on their menses, jewish women were given 7 days of rest during their periods because it is extremely uncomfortable for most women – your prophet insisted that oral sex with suffering menstruating women was okay with allah.

      He DISOBEYED. You’ve been owned again. Hope you don’t run away this time, imbecile.

      Like

    • qb

      Hey where d’ya go tampax? Licking your wounds after another beating, imbecile?

      LOL!!

      Like

    • this guys worships a god whose oneness is like two co-equal testicles , he wrote :

      “As for women on their menses, jewish women were given 7 days of rest during their periods because it is extremely uncomfortable for most women – ”

      When a woman has a discharge, her discharge being blood from her body, she shall remain in her impurity seven days; whoever touches her shall be unclean until evening.

      If a man lies with a woman in her infirmity and uncovers her nakedness, he has laid bare her flow and she has exposed her blood flow; both of them shall be cut off from among their people.

      Liked by 1 person

    • “, jewish women were given 7 days of rest during their periods because it is extremely uncomfortable for most women ”

      lol, lying piece of SHIT.

      Leviticus 15:19 When a woman has a discharge, her discharge being blood from her body, she shall remain in her impurity seven days; whoever touches her shall be unclean until evening…

      And if a man lies with her, her impurity is communicated to him; he shall be unclean seven days, and any bedding on which he lies shall become unclean.

      so any desparate guy wishing to lie with his wife will become impure, not that he caused his wife pain.
      it was about pure and impure . a woman was seen as impure/dirty woman.

      the man himself would become impure, not because he caused her pain, but because he did an act which was impure.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Hahahaha, I love seeing this moron trying to act tough and pretend that he has won an argument!

      Coco, you lovable loser, you ran off after taking a beating on this issue TWICE. First, you were humiliated with regard to the Prophet’s teaching that only sex is forbidden during menstruation. I showed you evidence from the Arabic words used in the Quran. But being the moron that you are, you continue to peddle your personal opinions. Do you speak Arabic, idiot? No? Well, then you are a moron who can’t admit when he is wrong about something. Pride goeth before a fall. You know this, right?

      Second, I pummeled you and your fellow clowns about the rules for menstruation in Christianity. I asked repeatedly if Christian husbands could have intercourse with their wives during menstruation. Every single Christian clown has avoided this question. You ran away as well, but after being embarrassed so many times, you gave up and tried to weasel your way out by providing an embarrassingly preposterous explanation. Why do you lie about your own scripture? Why do you misquote it? Don’t you remember the warning in Revelation not to change scripture?

      Your scripture is clear that the reason the Israelites were forbidden to even TOUCH their wives during menstruation was because it was an issue of purity, like heathcliff said. You got completely schooled on this, and then ran off like a scared little monkey. When I challenged you to come back, your puffed-up pride brought you back but you simply repeated the same nonsense all over again! What a pathetic Christian you are!

      Use your simian brain, idiot. If the reason for prohibiting sex during menstruation was out of sympathy for the woman, then why was the husband prohibited even from TOUCHING her? How would touching hurt the woman, you moron? Wouldn’t it be better for the husband to comfort his wife by gently touching her or hugging her? Why prohibit even that? You are a liar for Jesus, pathetic Christian monkey! Just like your false apostle Paul! It’s no wonder people are leaving your religion in droves!

      It must be embarrassing to find out that you are so out of touch and unaware of human sexuality. Maybe you are really just a little chimp who is still learning. Here is some reading for you:

      https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19350441
      http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0959353510396674

      The second link is interesting because it shows the positive and negative attitudes of women to sex during menstruation. In this study, why more women expressed a negative attitude to sex, it had NOTHING to do with physical discomfort or pain. Here is what the author says about the negative feelings:

      “Negative responses cohered around four themes: women’s discomfort and physical labor to clean ‘messes’, overt partner discomfort, negative self-perception and emotional labor to manage partner’s disgust.”

      Those who had expressed positive feelings did so for two reasons:

      “Positive responses cohered around two themes: physical and emotional pleasure from sex while menstruating, and rebellion against anti-menstrual attitudes. ”

      So it had more to do with discomfort about cleaning the “mess”, and the partner’s “discomfort” and “disgust”. Absolutely NOTHING to do with pain!!! Once again, you have NOTHING. You are just making things up just to avoid admitting that you are wrong. IDIOT! Where will you go from here, Coco? Go on, do your little monkey dance and eventually run away!

      Like

    • qb

      You just can’t answer why your prophet DISOBEYED the direct and clear command of his goat god. Worse still he got his followers to DISOBEY their god too. LOL!! You are an idiot.

      Let’s say it is true that your goat allowed muslims to do anything but have sex with their wives during menstruation, how does that justify mohammed reciting the eternal quran inches away from the menstrual blood of one of his wives?

      And sorry you got angry, dude, like I said do whatever you want in your own home – just deal with the fact that your prophet disobeyed his god.

      Just deal with it moron, don’t get mad at me for telling the truth.

      Hope you don’t run way this time moron.

      Like

    • LOL, you’re the one who has run away…TWICE! And now, you provide yet another embarrassing response that just shows what a complete moron you are! You completely avoided your latest embarrassment and instead fell back to your usual nonsense.

      I already showed that your claims against the Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) are the rantings of a fool. The Quran is clear that only sex is forbidden during menstruation. It seems you are finally accepting this fact, but like the typical flying chandelier monkey that you are, now you make a new idiotic argument! So what if the Prophet recited the Quran “inches away” from his menstruating wife, idiot? What do you think? The menstrual blood has some magical powers? You are a moron! Hahahahaha!

      Why did you lie about your scripture, Coco? Your scripture is clear that even touching a menstruating woman was prohibited. It has NOTHING to do with the woman’s comfort and had EVERYTHING to do with purity. Not only that, but you were completely exposed as an ignoramus when it comes to women’s sexuality. It seems you are just a little chimp, who still needs to get some sex education.

      So now, answer my question moron. Can Christian husbands have sex with their wives during menstruation? Yes or no? The previous answer was complete BS. You felt trapped and tried to weasel your way out with a preposterous answer and got completely neutered. Don’t run away again, loser! Answer the question!

      Like

    • Hey where d’ya go Coco, the tampon-obssessed monkey? Licking your wounds after another beating, imbecile?

      LOL!!

      Liked by 1 person

Please leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: