Debate today: Are the Gospels reliable?

Spoiler: no.

28056115_1446977668746573_4954302964520371994_n

Advertisements


Categories: Bart Ehrman, Bible, Biblical scholarship, Christianity, Debates

2 replies

  1. Lol that spoiler!
    Since it’s so obvious I guess it’s not even a spoiler.
    Except for (fundamentalist) Christians that is.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. So does Mike Licona think that Matthew 27:52 is reliable?
    It seems this problem of stubbornness goes back to the essence of christianity itself (i.e. 3=1 even though their brains tell them it cannot work).

    “And recite to them, [O Muhammad], the news of him to whom we gave [knowledge of] Our signs, but he detached himself from them; so Satan pursued him, and he became of the deviators.
    And if We had willed, we could have elevated him thereby, but he adhered [instead] to the earth and followed his own desire. So his example is like that of the dog: if you chase him, he pants, or if you leave him, he [still] pants. That is the example of the people who denied Our signs. So relate the stories that perhaps they will give thought.
    How evil an example [is that of] the people who denied Our signs and used to wrong themselves.
    Whoever Allah guides – he is the [rightly] guided; and whoever He sends astray – it is those who are the losers.” QT

    Like

Please leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: